NET GOLD WORDPRESS BLOG LINKS
*
https://tinyurl.com/yatshhmc
*
https://tinyurl.com/yatshhmc
.
.
RESEARCH GUIDES :
PUBLICATIONS :
ASSESSMENT :
EVALUATION :
FACT CHECKING :
DATABASE SEARCH RESULTS :
WEBSITES :
INTERNET SOURCES:
Evaluation of Sources:
Publication Fact Checking and Evaluation of Validity, Factual Content and Accuracy :
PARTS ONE AND TWO
.
.
BOOKS : JOURNAL ARTICLES : WEBSITES :
MEDIA LITERACY:
Russell Conwell Information Literacy Guide Series:
Media Literacy and News Literacy
https://sites.google.com/site/medialiteracyguide/
news reports and editorials and related content regarding regarding specific…
- Media Literacy Sources
- INFORMATION LITERACY RESEARCH GUIDE
- Database Searching Methods and Searching Techniques
- History of the Book, Printing and the Printing Press
- Articles by David Dillard
- Net-Gold
- Grey Literature Sources and Tools
- How to Write a Research Paper
- Dissertation and Theses Finding and Writing Sources
- How to Write an Annotated Bibliography
- Creating a Literature Review
- Copyright / Plagiarism Sources
- Fair Use Books, Websites and Database Search Results
- Freedom of Information and Related Sources and Database Search Results
- Databases and Search Engine Searches for Finding Book Reviews
SELECTED WEBSITES AND INTERNET RESOURCES
OR “ASSESSMENT OF VALIDITY” OR “VALIDITY ASSESSMENT” OR “CREDIBILITY OF SOURCES” OR “SOURCE CREDIBILITY”
Source credibility
Source credibility is “a term commonly used to imply a communicator’s positive characteristics that affect
the receiver’s acceptance of a message.”[1] Academic studies of this topic began in the 20th century and
were given a special emphasis during World War II, when the US government sought to use propaganda
to influence public opinion in support of the war effort. Psychologist Carl Hovland and his colleagues worked
at the War Department upon this during the 1940s and then continued experimental studies at Yale University.
They built upon the work of researchers in the first half of the 20th century who had developed a
Source-Message-Channel-Receiver model of communication and, with Muzafer Sherif, developed this as part
of their theories of persuasion and social judgement.[2][3][4][5]
About
Source credibility theory is an established theory that explains how communication’s persuasiveness is affected
by the perceived credibility of the source of the communication.[4][6] The credibility of all communication, regardless
of format, has been found to be heavily influenced by the perceived credibility of the source of that communication.[7]
The idea of credibility was first derived from Aristotle who argued that the speaker’s reliability must be built and
established in speech and that what the speaker did or said before such a speech was not of importance.
Aristotle divided the aspects of persuasion into three categories: ethos (credibility), pathos (emotion) and logos (logic).
As credibility refers to people believing who they trust, emotion and logic indicate a person’s emotional connection and
means of reasoning to convince one of a particular argument and/or speech.[8] The area of source credibility is studied
for practical applications in communication, marketing, law, and political science.[5][9][10]
Fact checking is the act of checking factual assertions in non-fictional text in order to determine the veracity and correctness of the factual statements in the text. This may be done either before (ante hoc) or after (post hoc) the text has been published or otherwise disseminated.[1]
Ante hoc fact-checking (fact checking before dissemination) aims to remove errors and allow text to proceed to dissemination (or to rejection if it fails confirmations or other criteria). Post hoc fact-checking is most often followed by a written report of inaccuracies, sometimes with a visual metric from the checking organization (e.g., Pinocchios from The Washington Post Fact Checker, or TRUTH-O-METER ratings from PolitiFact). Several organizations are devoted to post hoc fact-checking, such as FactCheck.org and PolitiFact.
Research on the impact of fact-checking is relatively recent but the existing research suggests that fact-checking does indeed correct misperceptions among citizens, as well as discouraging politicians from spreading misinformation.
Contents
[hide]
Post hoc fact-checking
Consistency across fact-checkers
One study finds that fact-checkers PolitiFact, FactCheck.org, and Washington Post’s Fact Checker
overwhelmingly agree on their evaluations of claims.[2][3]
However, a study by Morgan Marietta, David C. Barker and Todd Bowser found “substantial
differences in the questions asked and the answers offered.” They concluded that this limited
the “usefulness of fact-checking for citizens trying to decide which version of disputed realities
to believe.”[4]
A paper by Chloe Lim, Ph.D. student at Stanford University, finds little overlap in the statements
that fact-checkers check. Out of 1065 fact-checks by PolitiFact and 240 fact-checks by
The Washington Post‘s Fact-Checker, there were only 70 statements that both fact-checkers
checked. The study found that the fact-checkers gave consistent ratings for 56 out of 70 statements,
which means that one out every five times, the two fact-checkers disagree on the accuracy of statements.[5]
Effects[edit]
Studies of post hoc fact checking have made clear that such efforts often result in changes in the behavior,
in general, of both the speaker (making them more careful in their pronouncements) and of the listener or
reader (making them more discerning with regard to the factual accuracy of content); observations include
the propensities of audiences to be completely unswayed by corrections to errors regarding the most divisive
subjects, or the tendency to be more greatly persuaded by corrections of negative reporting (e.g., “attack ads”),
and to see minds changed only when the individual in error was someone reasonably like-minded to begin with.[6]
Correcting misperceptions[edit]
A 2015 study found evidence a “backfire effect” (correcting false information may make partisan individuals cling
more strongly to their views): “Corrective information adapted from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
website significantly reduced belief in the myth that the flu vaccine can give you the flu as well as concerns about its safety.
However, the correction also significantly reduced intent to vaccinate among respondents with high levels of concern
about vaccine side effects–a response that was not observed among those with low levels of concern.”[7] A 2017 study
attempted to replicate the findings of the 2015 study but failed to do so.[8]
A 2016 study found little evidence for the “backfire effect”: “By and large, citizens heed factual information, even when
such information challenges their partisan and ideological commitments.”[9] A study of Donald Trump supporters during
the 2016 race similarly found little evidence for the backfire effect: “When respondents read a news article about
Mr. Trump’s speech that included F.B.I. statistics indicating that crime had “fallen dramatically and consistently over time,”
their misperceptions about crime declined compared with those who saw a version of the article that omitted corrective
information (though misperceptions persisted among a sizable minority).”[10]
Studies have shown that fact-checking can affect citizens’ belief in the accuracy of claims made in political advertisement.[11]
A paper by a group of Paris School of Economics and Sciences Po economists found that falsehoods by Marine Le Pen
during the 2017 French presidential election campaign (i) successfully persuaded voters, (ii) lost their persuasiveness when
fact-checked, and (iii) did not reduce voters’ political support for Le Pen when her claims were fact-checked.[12]
A 2017 study in the Journal of Politics found that “that individuals consistently update political beliefs in the appropriate
direction, even on facts that have clear implications for political party reputations, though they do so cautiously and
with some bias… Interestingly, those who identify with one of the political parties are no more biased or cautious than pure
independents in their learning, conditional on initial beliefs.”[13]
A study by Yale University political scientists Gordon Pennycook and David G. Rand found that Facebook tags of fake
articles “did significantly reduce their perceived accuracy relative to a control without tags, but only modestly”.[14]
A Dartmouth study led by Brendan Nyhan found that Facebook tags had a greater impact than the Yale study found.[15]
A “disputed” tag on a false headline reduced the number of respondents who considered the headline accurate
from 29% to 19%, whereas a “rated false” tag pushed the number down to 16%.[15] The Yale study found evidence
of a backfire effect among Trump supporters younger than 26 years whereby the presence of both untagged and
tagged fake articles made the untagged fake articles appear more accurate.[14] In response to research which questioned
the effectiveness of the Facebook “disputed” tags, Facebook decided to drop the tags in December 2017 and would
instead put articles which fact-checked a fake news story next to the fake news story link whenever it is shared on Facebook.[16]
Based on the findings of a 2017 study in the journal Psychological Science, the most effective ways
to reduce misinformation through corrections is by:[17]
- limiting detailed descriptions of / or arguments in favor of the misinformation;
- walking through the reasons why a piece of misinformation is false rather than just labelling it false;
- presenting new and credible information which allows readers to update their knowledge of events
and understand why they developed an inaccurate understanding in the first place; - using video, as videos appear to be more effective than text at increasing attention and reducing
confusion, making videos more effective at correcting misperception than text.
The Year In Fact-Checking:
Your 10 top stories of 2017
BY ALEXIOS MANTZARLIS, JANE ELIZABETH & DANIEL FUNKE ·
DECEMBER 22, 2017
POYNTER.ORG
https://www.americanpressinstitute.org/category/fact-checking-project/
how to critically evaluate information found on the Web. This page includes
forms for teaching the process, articles for learning about the aspect of literacy,
and a list of bogus sites to use to showcase that all things on the Web are not real.
source credibilitynoun [ U ]
UK US MARKETING
Why the Fact-Checking at Facebook Needs to Be Checked
Brendan Nyhan @BrendanNyhan OCT. 23, 2017
Since the 2016 presidential campaign, Facebook has taken a number of actions to prevent the continued distribution of false news articles on its platform, most notably by labeling articles rated as false or misleading by fact checkers as “disputed.”
But how effective are these measures?
To date, Facebook has offered little information to the public other than a recent email to fact checkers asserting that labeled articles receive 80 percent fewer impressions. But more data is necessary to determine the success of these efforts. Research (including my own) suggests the need to carefully evaluate the effectiveness of Facebook’s interventions.
Yale’s Gordon Pennycook and David Rand offer two principal warnings. First, the effects of exposure to false information are not easily countered by labeling, as they find in a paper they wrote with Tyrone D. Cannon. False information we have previously encountered feels more familiar, producing a feeling of fluency that causes us to rate it as more accurate than information we have not seen before. This effect persists even when Facebook-style warnings label a headline “disputed.” We should be cautious about assuming that labels tagging articles as false are enough to prevent misinformation on social media from affecting people’s beliefs.
*
Source Credibility: on the Independent Effects of Trust and Expertise
John C. Mowen, Oklahoma State University
ABSTRACT – Marketing researchers and practitioners have tended
to assume that a more trustworthy source is more credible than
a less trustworthy source. However, previous studies have either
confounded trustworthiness with expertise and/or attractiveness,
or found that trustworthiness did not influence persuasion.
In the 2 x 3 between subjects factorial experiment three levels of
source expertise were crossed by two levels of trustworthiness.
Careful pretesting assured that the manipulations did not influence
ratings of source attractiveness. The results supported the hypotheses
developed from attribution theory that sources perceived to have
external reasons for making a persuasive argument will be discounted.
In addition, the results revealed that expert sources influenced
perceptions of the product’s qualities.
Joshua L. Wiener and John C. Mowen (1986) ,”Source Credibility:
on the Independent Effects of Trust and Expertise”, in NA –
Advances in Consumer Research Volume 13, eds.
Richard J. Lutz, Provo, UT :
Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 306-310.
The future of fact-checking is in digital technology, human trust
By Angie Drobnic Holan on Wednesday, July 12th, 2017 at 3:54 p.m.
Expanding Fact Checking at Google
https://www.blog.google/topics/journalism-news/expanding-fact-checking-google/
OR “ASSESSMENT OF VALIDITY” OR “VALIDITY ASSESSMENT” OR “CREDIBILITY OF SOURCES” OR “SOURCE CREDIBILITY”
GOOGLE BOOKS
*
GOOGLE SCHOLAR
PENN STATE SUMMON SEARCH
- Archival Material (110)Include Exclude
- Article (2)Include Exclude
- Artifact (1)Include Exclude
- Audio Recording (287)Include Exclude
- Book / eBook (129,529)Include Exclude
- Book Chapter (11,012)Include Exclude
- Book Review (13,786)Include Exclude
- Computer File (1)Include Exclude
- Conference Proceeding (2,633)Include Exclude
- Data Set (69)Include Exclude
- Dissertation/Thesis (23,867)Include Exclude
- Electronic Resource (44)Include Exclude
- Government Document (1,116)Include Exclude
- Image (4)Include Exclude
- Journal / eJournal (118)Include Exclude
- Journal Article (134,985)Include Exclude
- Library Holding (1)Include Exclude
- Magazine (24)Include Exclude
- Magazine Article (5,285)Include Exclude
- Manuscript (1,697)Include Exclude
- Market Research (46)Include Exclude
- Microform (24)Include Exclude
- Music Score (4)Include Exclude
- Newsletter (2,602)Include Exclude
- Newspaper (31)Include Exclude
- Newspaper Article (57,491)Include Exclude
- Pamphlet (5)Include Exclude
- Paper (399)Include Exclude
- Patent (82)Include Exclude
- Photograph (1)Include Exclude
- Poem (1)Include Exclude
- Poster (3)Include Exclude
- Presentation (13)Include Exclude
- Publication (182)Include Exclude
- Publication Article (4)Include Exclude
- Reference (4,590)Include Exclude
- Report (1,465)Include Exclude
- Research Guide (807)Include Exclude
- Special Collection (10)Include Exclude
- Standard (47)Include Exclude
- Streaming Video (53)Include Exclude
- Student Thesis (176)Include Exclude
- Technical Report (338)Include Exclude
- Trade Publication Article (996)Include Exclude
- Transcript (2,662)Include Exclude
- Video Recording (50)Include Exclude
- Web Resource (3,207)Include Exclude
Source Evaluation – Common Core Standards ELA – Internet Sources …
https://www.flocabulary.com/unit/source-evaluation/
1.
Learn how to evaluate web sources for research with Flocabulary’s educational rap song and lesson plan.
Fact checking online is more important than ever – YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ryjpu-NWYm8
1.
Nov 18, 2016 – Uploaded by MetroSverige
A world with or without fact checking? We know what we prefer. Swedish fact checker Viralgranskaren and IIS …
Fact-checking Trump’s airline safety boast – CNN Video – CNN.com
www.cnn.com/…/donald-trump-fact-check-airline-safety-jake-tappe...
2 days ago
Jake Tapper looks at Donald Trump’s suggestion that his aviation policies resulted in the “best and safest …
Google doubles down on fact-checking the internet – CNET
https://www.cnet.com/…/google-doubles-down-on-internet-fact-che...
Oct 26, 2017
After being criticized for not catching fake news online, the tech giant partners with a fact-checking network to …
Fact-checking a week of Sarah Sanders – CNN Video – CNN.com
www.cnn.com/…/fact-check-sarah-sanders-white-house-briefing-vst...
Nov 2, 2017
White House press secretary Sarah Sanders said some questionable things from the podium recently.
Why fact-checking can’t stop Trump’s lies – YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S8DQ2kseTWw
Aug 30, 2017 – Uploaded by Vox
Why do Trump’s supporters continue to believe misinformation, even in the face offact-checking? Subscribe …
Fact-checking ‘The Crown’: Did the Duke of Windsor plot with Hitler to …
https://www.washingtonpost.com/…/fact-checking-the-crown-did-th...
Dec 30, 2017
In late October of 1937, Adolf Hitler welcomed a rather well-known couple to his mountain retreat for a cup of tea …
============================================================
*
Evaluating Sources for Credibility
•
116K views2 years ago
What does it mean for a source to be credible? Why is it important to use these sources? How can you tell if a source is credible?
CC
•
644K views3 months ago
This video is intended for educational, documentary purposes only. Credit: american warrior revolution.
Fact-checking Trump’s Charlottesville remarks
57K views4 months ago
CBS News justice reporter Paula Reid was on the ground during the rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, and joins CBSN to fact-check
Fact-Checking “10 Lies You Were Told about Islam” (Part 1)
•
160K views1 year ago
Support Acts 17 videos on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=3615911 http://www.answeringmuslims.com Recently,
Lessons from Con Art School: Source Credibility
•
1.9K views2 years ago
This lesson from the Con Art School shows you how fraudsters fake their expertise and history to build their victims’ trust. Use what
Will Moy: “Post post-truth – Fact Checking at Full Fact” | Talks at Google
4.4K views11 months ago
Will Moy is the Director of Full Fact, a UK-based independent factchecking charity. He appears regularly on TV, radio, and at events
Fact-Checking Sargon at the Joe Rogan Podcast (Anita and Harassment)
•
7.5K views5 months ago
“Sargon of Akkad” went on the Joe Rogan podcast and told a lie. There aren’t really two ways about it. The easiest thing I’ve ever
Décodex, “fact-checking”, “post-vérité” : de quoi sont-ils le nom ?
53K views10 months ago
Abonnez-vous : http://bit.ly/DanyCaligula ▻ Fact-checking, post-vérité, ces expressions sont à la mode… Vient alors le Décodex, un
Fact-checking Elon Musk & Iran’s Nuclear “Plan B”: VICE News Tonight Full Episode (HBO)
135K views2 months ago
This segment originally aired Oct. 26, 2017, on VICE News Tonight on HBO. The House of Representatives approved non-nuclear
Mix – Evaluating Sources for Credibility
· Evaluating Sources for Credibility3:15
· Peer Review in 3 Minutes3:16
Fact-checking Trump’s global warming claim
29K views1 week ago
President Trump used the recent cold weather in the United States to mock climate change on Twitter.
Fact-Checking Sam Harris: Islam and the Virgin Birth of Jesus
•
69K views1 year ago
Support Acts 17 videos on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=3615911 ***UPDATE*** Sam Harris responded: “I meant that
Fact-checking the UN: Is the Internet dangerous for women? | FACTUAL FEMINIST
109K views2 years ago
A new UN report claims that “73 percent of women have been exposed to online violence.” To combat this alleged epidemic of sexist
CC
Le Fact Checking – C à Vous – 22/12/2017
•
5.9K views2 weeks ago
Le Fact Checking, présenté par Samuel Laurent des Décodeurs (Le Monde), démêle le vrai du faux dans l’actualité politique et
Debate Fact Checking: Carly Fiorina
114K views2 years ago
The thirty-seven Republican candidates on stage last night threw out a ton of facts and figures. It’s hard to know what’s true and
CC
•
407 views2 years ago
Fact Checking The March Against Monsanto Protesters – Final Thoughts
•
13K views1 year ago
Over the past few years, I have been attending March Against Monsanto protests in the UK in an attempt to gain an insight into why
Fact Checking the London March Against Monsanto Protesters – Liz O’Neill of GM-Freeze
•
17K views2 years ago
Earlier in the year, thanks to the wonderful people who have been supporting me thought patreon, I was able to take the train down
Essay #1 Prompt: Critical Evaluation Tutorial
•
879 views2 years ago
Brief explanation of Essay #1.
Fact-Checking Sam Harris 2: Did Jesus Command Christians to Kill in Luke 19:27?
•
97K views1 year ago
Support Acts 17 videos on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=3615911 http://www.acts17.net Sam Harris claims that Jesus
Fact-Checking Hillary Clinton’s Presidential Debate Lies
134K views1 year ago
Stefan Molyneux fact-checks Hillary Clinton’s claims from the third and final Presidential debate and explains why media falsehoods
“FACT CHECKING” Donald Trump LIES
•
34K views10 months ago
Fact Checking Congressman Jim Renacci’s Claims On GOP Tax Plan | Velshi & Ruhle | MSNBC
43K views2 months ago
Ali Velshi & Stephanie Ruhle fact check Ohio Rep. Jim Renacci on his claims about the U.S. economy and the benefits of the GOP
CC
Fact checking Donald Trump’s immigration comments
106K views2 years ago
Dan Simon looks at the numbers behind Donald Trumps controversial immigration comments.
CC
CNN-Jake Tapper gives FAKE NEWS while “Fact Checking” President Trump #TFNOriginal
•
12K views3 weeks ago
Of course Hillary Clinton lied to the FBI, if she was even seriously interviewed. The FBI agent conducting her interview, was later
Fact Checking President Donald Trump’s Biggest Falsehoods And Lies of 2017 | NBC News
4.1K views1 week ago
From inauguration crowd size to the mischaracterization of the Russia investigation, take a look back on some of Donald Trump’s
SYRO MALABAR UK – A CRITICAL EVALUATION
•
4.3K views7 months ago
SYRO MALABAR UK – A CRITICAL EVALUATION.
22K views9 months ago
Follow Kyle on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/kylekulinski Here’s The Secular Talk Amazon Link: http://www.amazon.com/?tag=
CC
Google doubles down on fact checking, Amazon to sell prescription drugs? (Tech Today)
9.4K views2 months ago
Watch more from Tech Today here – http://cnet.co/2tdXzNv Today’s major tech stories include Google’s partnership with the
Fact Checking the Fact Checkers
•
7.3K views1 year ago
The media continues to fact check claims Donald Trump made during the first Presidential Debate, but it may be the fact checkers
Fact-Checking “10 Lies You Were Told about Islam” (Part 2)
•
75K views1 year ago
http://www.answeringmuslims.com Recently, AllTime10s posted a video titled “10 Lies You Were Told about Islam” (https://www.
Core i9-7900X Review: Fact-Checking Intel
80K views6 months ago
Reviewing the Intel i9-7900X CPU, including game streaming benchmarks, VR benchmarks, Blender, Premiere, overclocking, &
4K
Fact-checking Justin Trudeau’s “middle class” ad
•
24K views2 years ago
Marissa Semkiw reports for TheRebel.media: Justin Trudeau and the Liberal Party released in a new ad earlier this week called “A
Fact-Checking The First Presidential Debate | Election 2016 | The New York Times
28K views1 year ago
Donald J. Trump and Hillary Clinton squared off over the Islamic State militant group, jobs and climate change. Produced by:
Fact-checking the UN: Is the Internet dangerous for women? | FACTUAL FEMINIST
109K views2 years ago
A new UN report claims that “73 percent of women have been exposed to online violence.” To combat this alleged epidemic of sexist
CC
Fact Checking the London March Against Monsanto Protesters – Liz O’Neill of GM-Freeze
•
17K views2 years ago
Earlier in the year, thanks to the wonderful people who have been supporting me thought patreon, I was able to take the train down
Fact-Checking Obama’s Critics | msnbc
48K views2 years ago
Pres. Obama said to fact-check his critics, you’d have to “run back the tape.” So msnbc’s “The Last Word” did just that. » Subscribe to
Fact checking Donald Trump on Boeing jobs
4.9K views2 months ago
Fact check: President Donald Trump claims that a deal with Boeing and Singapore Airlines will create 70000 jobs in the U.S. Peter
Republican Debate Audience Boos Fact-Checking
39K views1 year ago
Watch Full Debate: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIzKPonDPNk Clip from The Kyle Kulinski Show, which airs live on Blog Talk
65K views5 years ago
Will Obamacare actually drive prices up 11-14 cents per pizza as Papa John’s CEO claims? CNN’s Tom Foreman investigates. For
Fact or Fakenews? Fact checking with Norma John from Finland
22K views8 months ago
Norma John will represent Finland at the 2017 Eurovision Song Contest with the song Blackbird. Learn all about them as they
Fact-checking Trump’s reasons for a transgender military ban
9.4K views4 months ago
Following a tweet from President Trump that said transgender people would not be allowed to serve in the military, the White House
CC
Fact checking Toronto Star’s list of Trump’s “false claims”
•
7.9K views2 months ago
Christopher Wilson of The Rebel.Media reports: The Toronto Star’s Daniel Dale maintains a running list of purportedly false claims
Debate Fact Checking: Trump, Ben Carson, Bobby Jindal
91K views2 years ago
There were several whoppers told at last night’s GOP debate. The so-called hyper-partisan “liberal media” sat and watched most of
CC
Where is the Fact Checking? How PolitiFact and Others Have Failed Us | Matthew Vadum
•
3.9K views9 months ago
Our nation needs objective fact checking, but organizations such as PolitiFact and Factcheck.org who have proclaimed themselves
CC
Fact checking Clinton and Trump claims
11K views1 year ago
Tom Foreman fact checks Hillary Clinton’s claims that African Americans did better under her husband’s administration and Donald
CC
Fact-Checking “10 Lies You Were Told about Islam” (Part 3)
•
62K views1 year ago
http://www.answeringmuslims.com Recently, AllTime10s posted a video titled “10 Lies You Were Told about Islam” (https://www.
MSNBC Does Two Whole Minutes Of Trump Fact-Checking
•
37K views1 year ago
MSNBC brought on Politifact’s Angie Holan to fact check recent claims from Donald Trump. The presence of facts on MSNBC,
Checking The Fact-Checkers On Pres Trump Address – News Abuse Fact Checking Edition – Tucker Carlson
Mass Tea Party – Wake Up America!
•
397 views10 months ago
Checking The Fact-Checkers On Pres Trump Address – News Abuse Fact Checking Edition – Tucker Carlson ==================
On Facebooks Dystopian Fact Checking
22K views9 months ago
Support my work via donation: Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/Styxhexenhammer666 Makersupport: https://www.makersupport.
Fact-checking Trump’s plan to balance the budget
10K views7 months ago
Jake Tapper, in partnership with FactCheck.org, looks at President Trump’s promise to balance the budget within 10 years. Read
NDP blocking Rebel from fact checking their carbon tax?
•
8.1K views9 months ago
Sheila Gunn Reid reports Notley is putting up another paywall, this time to deter her from filing an FOI request for details on the
Fact Checking The $20 KFC Meme
•
9.7K views11 months ago
Stop being poor. And fat. Original Meme: https://www.facebook.com/446065882157297/photos/a.446068322157053.1073741826.
Rural Banking – A Critical Evaluation | Class 11 Economics Rural Development
•
685 views7 months ago
Rural Banking – A Critical Evaluation | Class 11 Economics Rural Development by Parul Madan Scholarslearning.com is an online
Fact Checking March Against Monsanto Protesters #2
•
12K views2 years ago
Myles, once again, talks about one of the speeches he heard whilst attending the March Against Monsanto protest last year. This
Fact-checking Politifact. SchiffRadio.com Exclusive!
•
12K views6 years ago
Peter gets PolitiFact’s Jacob Geiger to admit he actually doesn’t know what he’s talking about in criticizing Virginia Republican
Toward Automated Fact-Checking: Detecting Check-worthy Factual Claims by ClaimBuster
•
1K views6 months ago
Toward Automated Fact-Checking: Detecting Check-worthy Factual Claims by ClaimBuster Naeemul Hassan (University of
FACT CHECKING PATHOLOGICAL LIAR donald trump
•
139K views1 year ago
Effeminate-handed anti-American racist birther, Four-Time Draft Dodger, Four-Time Bankruptcy Filer and roadkill-topped loser
Fact Checking March Against Monsanto Protesters #3
•
13K views2 years ago
I have previously made videos critical of Sue Mallender and Tracey Lloyd, who gave speeches at the March Against Monsanto
•
1.8K views4 years ago
Link to Strong Sample of Evaluation of Sources: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BwLu6nZrWJfsU0dCbkhLMVlWOVU/edit?usp=
•
1.3K views3 years ago
Tips on ev.
Newt Gingrich: Fact-Checking Is For The Weak
68K views1 year ago
Newt Gingrich is really against moderators and fact-checking for some reason. Some reason named Donald Trump. Cenk Uygur,
CC
Fact checking Tom Price on the GOP health care plan
8.2K views9 months ago
Jake Tapper, in partnership with FactCheck.org, on Tom Price’s claim that “nobody will be worse off financially.”. Read more at
CC
Fact-checking Trump’s claim on FBI turmoil
37K views7 months ago
CNN’s Jake Tapper and factcheck.org examine President Trump’s interview with NBC’s Lester Holt about the firing of FBI director
Fact-checking Trump’s claim on US murder rate
15K views10 months ago
CNN’s Brian Stelter fact-checks President Donald Trump’s claim that the US murder rate is at an all-time high.
CC
7 Days to Die testing – 2: Finding engines * Mythbusting and fact-checking 7d2d*
19K views1 year ago
I take myths, rumours and ideas from the world of the game 7 Days to Die and check them to see if there is any truth to them. In this
Critical Evaluation of Scientific Articles
•
4.3K views3 years ago
This video provides an overview of the general structure of a scientific paper and what kind of information each section is supposed
Presidential Debate Commission Is Against Fact Checking
38K views1 year ago
The executive director of the Commission on Presidential Debates is wary about all these demands that the moderators should be
Asselineau Fact Checking #1: les armes chimique en Syrie
•
951 views3 months ago
Début d’une série “Fact Checking” en partenariat avec le-rameau.org/ Chaine youtube du Rameau https://www.youtube.com/
Fact Checking March Against Monsanto Protesters #1
•
14K views3 years ago
The first in a series of videos fact checking some of the speakers from the March Against Monsanto protest in Nottingham. In this
Fact-checking the dossier from Buzzfeed! (Since the mainstream media won’t do it!) via @Liz_Wheeler
•
83K views11 months ago
Follow Liz on Twitter: @Liz_Wheeler Facebook: www.facebook.com/TippingPointonOAN Facebook: www.facebook.com/
Google to start fact-checking fake news stories
1.2K views8 months ago
Google is installing a fact-checker for potentially misleading stories in its search results. Learn more about this story at http://www.newsy.
Fact Checking The Republican Debate
•
1.1K views2 years ago
December 16, 2015 Al Jazeera News http://MOXNews.com.
Fact-Checking Hillary Clinton’s Florida Rally Speech (10/26/16)
•
2.9K views1 year ago
Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=sheilaalien She talks to her voters like she thinks they’re
Fact Checking The GOP’s Health Care Claims | NBC Nightly News
611 views7 months ago
We look at the details of the new GOP health care plan and how the details of the bill line up with GOP leaders’ claims about how the
CC
Fact-checking Trump’s claim that Russia paid Hillary Clinton for uranium
7.8K views9 months ago
President Trump sowed more confusion on Russia when he claimed that Hillary Clinton was paid by Russia for the sale of uranium,
Fact checking Trump on crimes by undocumented immigrants
7.4K views1 year ago
Is it true, as Donald Trump claimed, that there are 2-3 million people who entered the United States ‘illegally’ and then went on to
Fact Checking Trumps Economic Claims
•
706 views6 months ago
Fact Checking Trumps Economic Claims.
“Fact Checking” Org OUTED as a Soros Funded Operation
1.3K views5 months ago
Cut Your Cable For Good Click Here – https://tigerstream.net/getatiger Use Promo Code JB70 for $70 off MY NEW CHANNEL https://
Google Brings Fake News Fact-Checking to News Searches
846 views8 months ago
Technalysis Research President Bob O’Donnell and Bloomberg’s Jitendra Waral discuss largest search engine Google’s rolling out
•
5K views2 years ago
Fact Checking Trump and Hillary Comments: Which are more dangerous? – Dennis Prager
•
77K views1 year ago
Trump’s ‘Many people are saying’ and says the election will be rigged are analyzed by Dennis Prager, Brian Stelter, Angela Rye,
Fact checking the federal leaders’ debate
3.2K views2 years ago
Were the points made in the federal leaders’ debate factual? Our Adrienne Arsenault takes a closer look. »»» Subscribe to The
Debate fact checking: Who was telling the truth?
18K views2 years ago
CNN’s Tom Foreman fact checks the Republican presidential candidates’ comments they made during the second GOP debate.
CC
Fact checking Trump Coal mines open, prospects bleak
•
1.1K views6 months ago
Trump Breaking News Network – Fact-checking Trump Coal mines open, prospects bleak As President Trump announced on
CC
Fact Checking Donald Trump’s Debate Statements | MSNBC
18K views1 year ago
Politifact staff writer Jon Greenberg joins MSNBC’s Tamron Hall following the first presidential debate of 2016 to explain just how
Fact checking Jubilee’s manifesto
•
2.1K views6 months ago
Jubilee party launched its manifesto on 26th of June giving a track record of what it claimed to have achieved. Some are
Down to the details: Fact-checking the debate
16K views1 year ago
Looking at the validity of candidates’ claims from the town hall debate.
•
1.2K views5 years ago
A short video establishing the importance of critical evaluation of source text.
Canadian taxes: Fact checking the tax debate (The Investigators with Diana Swain)
7.6K views3 months ago
Canadian taxes: Fact checking the tax debate. Diana Swain talks to VICE News reporter Justin Ling about the challenges of
#CIJSummer 2017: Fact-Checking Brexit
The Centre for Investigative Journalism
•
221 views5 months ago
Full Fact checked Brexit claims on both sides of the argument during the 2016 EU referendum campaigns. In this session you will
Fact checking the Democratic debate
8.5K views2 years ago
How do the Democratic candidates’ claims hold up under closer examination? CNN’s Tom Foreman takes a look.
CC
Fact-checking the NDP’s promises
•
519K views2 years ago
Fact Checking Trump’s Foxconn Claims | Los Angeles Times
254 views3 months ago
Foxconn has previously announced plans for factories in the U.S. and other countries that have not come to fruition. (Sept. 8, 2017)
Fact-checking the first Clinton-Trump debate
5.2K views1 year ago
The presidential candidates dared reporters to fact-check them for the first presidential debate, and we did. We found both Hillary
A Critical Evaluation of the Fine-Tuning Argument for the Existence of God
•
1.6K views1 year ago
COPY OF PRESS RELEASE: Hud Hudson, professor of Philosophy at Western Washington University, will give a talk titled “A
Miss B’s quick guide to…Source Evaluation
•
2.2K views4 years ago
Overview of what you need to think about when evaluating sources in your history lessons.
Fact-Checking Donald Trump’s Faulty on “Sources” #TrumpPresidency #POTUS
•
383 views5 months ago
Thanks for Watching! Please Share and Subscribe! The First 100 Days of President Donald Trump.
Fact Checking Adnan Rashid Snippets
•
2.8K viewsStreamed 1 week ago
SUBSCRIBE TO TITANS TV https://www.youtube.com/c/kalam_el SUPPORT TITANS TV, Kalam EL https://www.gofundme.com/
George Lakoff Speaks on Fact Checking without Lies. @realdonaldtrump #POTUS @GeorgeLakoff
•
2K views10 months ago
Thanks for Watching! Please Share and Subscribe! The First 100 Days of President Donald Trump.
Fact-Checking President Trump’s Paris Agreement Speech | CNBC
2.5K views7 months ago
CNBC fact-checked some of the reasons the president presented for why the U.S. should abandon the Paris Climate agreement. »
Fact Checking the Presidential Candidates | Hillary Clinton
•
570K views1 year ago
SHARE THIS VIDEO WITH FRIENDS AND FAMILY!! ———————————————————————————————————–
Fact Checking President Trump’s many twists and turns on DACA
2.5K views4 months ago
President Trump’s position on DACA has gone through several twists and turns over the years. Subscribe to The Washington Post
CC
Fact Checking The London March Against Monsanto Protesters – Rapper
•
8.7K views1 year ago
I know that you people like my well-researched, in-depth videos… but I feel like being bit of a dick today! ✓ Support me on Patreon –
Fact Checking Trump’s Speech To The United Nations General Assembly
•
96 views3 months ago
Fact checking President Donald Trump’s speech to the United Nations General Assembly Don’t forget to subscribe and follow us:
============================================================
GOOGLE DOMAIN LIMITED SEARCHES AND MORE
NEWS
*
BLOGS
*
MAGAZINES
*
JOURNALS
https://tinyurl.com/yczj9u4b
*
“PEER REVIEWED”
*
JSTOR
*
PUBMED
*
“PUBMED CENTRAL”
*
“PUBMED HEALTH”
*
SCIENCEDIRECT
*
“LITERATURE REVIEW”
https://tinyurl.com/ydhkkhnp
*
“SYSTEMATIC REVIEW”
*
“META ANALYSIS”
*
TRIP MEDICAL DATABASE
https://tinyurl.com/ya2falxd
*
POGOFROG
*
*
David Dillard
Temple University
http://workface.com/e/daviddillard
NET-GOLD
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/net-gold
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/net-gold.html
https://groups.io/org/groupsio/net-gold/archives
Research Guides
https://sites.google.com/site/researchguidesonsites/
Research Paper Writing
https://sites.google.com/site/howtowriteasuperresearchpaper/
Employment
https://sites.google.com/site/employmentsources/
Internships
https://sites.google.com/site/internshipsarticles/
Blog
https://educatorgold.wordpress.com/
Twitter: davidpdillard
Sport-Med
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/sport-med.html
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/sport-med.html
https://groups.io/g/SportMed/topics
|
[public-health] RESOURCE LISTS : RESEARCH GUIDES : SUBJECT GUIDES : EVIDENCE BASED : SOURCE EVALUATION : BIBLIOGRAPHIES : WEBLIOGRAPHIES : DATABASE SEARCH RESULTS: Sources Providing Guidance, Guidelines, Lists and Database Search Results for Evaluating the Quality of Research Sources
for Evaluating the Quality of Research Sources
========================================
https://sites.google.com/site/researchguidesonsites/
========================================
SOURCE EVALUATION :
EVALUATING SOURCES :
TERM PAPERS :
RESEACH PAPERS :
RESEARCH DESIGN :
RESEARCH METHODS :
TEACHING RESEARCH SKILLS:
A Selective Bibliography of Sources That Teach Source Evaluation for Research Papers and Instruct How to Teach Source Evaluation
.
.
SOURCE EVALUATION :
EVALUATING SOURCES :
TERM PAPERS :
RESEACH PAPERS :
RESEARCH DESIGN :
RESEARCH METHODS :
TEACHING RESEARCH SKILLS:
A Selective Bibliography of Sources That Teach Source Evaluation
for Research Papers and Instruct How to Teach Source Evaluation
.
.
WEBBIB1516
.
.
A Selective Bibliography of Sources That Teach Source Evaluation
for Research Papers and Instruct How to Teach Source Evaluation
.
.
Selected Books
Successful Strategies for Teaching Undergraduate Research
Editors Marta Deyrup, Beth Bloom
Publisher Scarecrow Press, 2013
ISBN 0810887177, 9780810887176
Length 204 pages
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Undergraduates and library research: what’s changed, what hasn’t, what now? /
Mary W. George —
The State of Teaching Today. Research questions and the research question:
what are we teaching when we teach research? /
Heidi L.M. Jacobs —
Understanding the relationship between good research and good writing /
Barbara J. D’Angelo —
Toward the “good” research assignment: a librarian speaks /
Roberta Tipton —
Toward the “good” research assignment: an academic speaks /
Willilamjames Hull Hoffer —
Teaching new media as a form of writing: explorations in evolving genres /
James Elmborg —
From punitive policing to proactive prevention: approaches to teaching information
ethics in the college classroom / Maria T. Accardi —
Assessing the information research process /
Stephanie Sterling Brasley. —
The Strategies in Action: Four Ideas That Work. Sources before search:
a scaffolded approach to teaching research /
Stephanie N. Otis —
RAIDS for research /
Sara D Miller, Nancy C. DeJoy, Benjamin M. Oberdock —
College students as Wikipedia editors: new pathways to information literacy /
Davida Scharf —
Training the trainer: librarians as faculty coaches and workshop designers /
Beth Bloom.
*
The Research Paper: A Guide to Library and Internet Research
Authors Dawn Rodrigues, Raymond J. Rodrigues
Edition 3, illustrated
Publisher Prentice Hall, 2003
ISBN 0130982563, 9780130982568
Length 259 pages
*
Research Papers
Authors William Coyle, Joe Law
Edition 16
Publisher Cengage Learning, 2013
ISBN 1133713017, 9781133713012
Length 272 pages
*
Building Better Essays
Cengage Advantage Books
New 1st Editions in Developmental English Series
Author Gina Hogan
Publisher Cengage Learning, 2012
ISBN 0495905178, 9780495905172
Length 272 pages
*
Quality Research Papers:
For Students of Religion and Theology
Authors
Nancy Jean Vyhmeister, Terry Dwain Robertson
Publisher Harper Collins, 2014
ISBN 0310514037, 9780310514039
Length 304 pages
*
Real Essays with Readings:
Writing for Success in College, Work, and Everyday Life
Author Susan Anker
Publisher Macmillan, 2011
ISBN 0312648081, 9780312648084
Length 912 pages
*
Research Paper Handbook: Your Complete Guide
Research Paper Handbook Series
Author James D. Lester
Publisher Good Year Books, 2005
ISBN 1596470763, 9781596470767
Length 232 pages
*
Writing the Research Paper: A Handbook
Authors Anthony Winkler, Jo Ray McCuen-Metherell
Edition 7, illustrated
Publisher Cengage Learning, 2007
ISBN 1413011713, 9781413011715
Length 360 pages
*
Writing the Research Paper: A Handbook
Authors
Anthony C. Winkler, Jo Ray McCuen-Metherell
Edition 8
Publisher Cengage Learning, 2011
ISBN 1133169023, 9781133169024
Length 360 pages
*
Principles of Writing Research Papers
Penguin academics
Author James D. Lester
Edition 2, illustrated
Publisher Penguin Academics, 2007
Original from the University of Virginia
Digitized Nov 24, 2009
ISBN 032142610X, 9780321426109
Length 266 pages
*
Writing, Reading, and Research
Authors Richard Veit, Christopher Gould
Edition 8, illustrated
Publisher Cengage Learning, 2009
ISBN 0547191049, 9780547191041
Length 640 pages
*
The Johns Hopkins Guide to Digital Media
UPCC book collections on Project MUSE
Author Marie-Laure Ryan
Editors Marie-Laure Ryan, Lori Emerson, Benjamin J. Robertson
Edition illustrated
Publisher JHU Press, 2013
ISBN 142141225X, 9781421412252
Length 553 pages
*
MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers
Authors
Joseph Gibaldi,
Modern Language Association of America
Edition 4, illustrated, reprint
Publisher
Modern Language Association of America, 1995
ISBN 0873525655, 9780873525657
Length 293 pages
*
A Manual for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations,
Seventh Edition:
Chicago Style for Students and Researchers
Chicago Guides to Writing, Editing, and
Author Kate L. Turabian
Contributors Wayne C. Booth, Gregory G. Colomb,
Joseph M. Williams, Wayne C. University of Chicago Press Staff
Edition revised
Publisher University of Chicago Press, 2009
ISBN 0226823385, 9780226823386
Length 436 pages
*
The Sundance Writer:
A Rhetoric, Reader, and Research Guide, Brief
Author Mark Connelly
Edition 5
Publisher Cengage Learning, 2012
ISBN 113371370X, 9781133713708
Length 752 pages
*
The Wadsworth Handbook
Authors Laurie G. Kirszner, Stephen R. Mandell
Edition 10
Publisher Cengage Learning, 2013
ISBN 1285500121, 9781285500126
Length 864 pages
*
Usability of Complex Information Systems:
Evaluation of User Interaction
Editors Michael Albers, Brian Still
Edition illustrated
Publisher CRC Press, 2010
ISBN 1439828954, 9781439828953
Length 399 pages
*
Fusion: Integrated Reading and Writing, Book 2
Authors
Dave Kemper, Verne Meyer, John Van Rys, Patrick Sebranek
Edition 2
Publisher Cengage Learning, 2015
ISBN 1305537947, 9781305537941
Length 656 pages
*
Quick Access: Essays and Term Papers
Quick Access
Author Research and Education Association
Publisher Research & Education Assoc., 2009
ISBN 0738607282, 9780738607283
Length 4 pages
*
A Guide to MLA Documentation
Author Joseph F. Trimmer
Edition 9, illustrated, annotated
Publisher Cengage Learning, 2012
ISBN 1111837074, 9781111837075
Length 48 pages
*
Insightful Writing: A Process Rhetoric with Readings
Authors David Sabrio, Mitchell Burchfield
Edition illustrated
Publisher Cengage Learning, 2008
ISBN 0618870261, 9780618870264
Length 336 pages
*
The Chicago Manual of Style
Author University of Chicago. Press
Contributor University of Chicago
Publisher University of Chicago Press, 2003
ISBN 0226104036, 9780226104034
*
The Curious Researcher:
A Guide to Writing Research Papers
Author Bruce Ballenger
Edition 7, illustrated
Publisher Pearson Education, 2011
ISBN 0205172873, 9780205172870
Length 348 pages
*
Writing Research Papers Across the Curriculum
Advantage (Thomson)
Advantage series
Author Susan M. Hubbuch
Edition 5, illustrated
Publisher Thomson Wadsworth, 2004
ISBN 1413002374, 9781413002379
Length 450 pages
*
Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper: Evaluating Sources
University of Southern California Libraries
http://libguides.usc.edu/c.php?g=235034&p=1561749
*
Purpose of Guide
Types of Research Designs
- Choosing a Research Problem
- Preparing to Write
- The Abstract
- The Introduction
- The Literature Review
- The Methodology
- The Results
Using Non-Textual Elements
- The Discussion
- The Conclusion
- Proofreading Your Paper
- Citing Sources
Annotated Bibliography
Giving an Oral Presentation
Grading Someone Else’s Paper
How to Manage Group Projects
Writing a Book Review
Writing a Case Study
Writing a Field Report
Writing a Policy Memo
Writing a Research Proposa
http://libguides.usc.edu/c.php?g=235034&p=1561749
.
.
.
How to Write a Research Paper
http://guides.temple.edu/research-papers
*
How to Write an Annotated Bibliography
http://guides.temple.edu/annotated-bibliographies
*
How to Find and Write Book Reviews:
Databases and Search Engine Searches for Finding Book Reviews
http://guides.temple.edu/bkrev
*
Digital Humanities and Digital Initiatives Sources
http://guides.temple.edu/digital-humanities
*
DISSERTATIONS: Finding and Writing Dissertations and Theses
http://guides.temple.edu/dissertations
*
Faculty Credentialing
http://guides.temple.edu/FacultyCredentialing
*
GOVERNMENT PUBLICATION MANUALS :
Government Writing Manuals Guides and Handbooks
http://guides.temple.edu/GovWritingManuals
*
Grey Literature Sources and Tools
http://guides.temple.edu/grey-literature
*
INFORMATION LITERACY AND FRIENDS
*
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT GUIDE SERIES:
COPYRIGHT, Intellectual Property and Plagiarism Sources
http://guides.temple.edu/copyright-plagiarism
*
Fair Use Under Copyright Law:
Fair Use Books, Websites and Database Search Results
http://guides.temple.edu/fair-use
*
JOURNAL CITATION RANKING SUBJECT LISTS FEATURING SCIMAGO:
Citation Analysis, Journal Rankings and Rankings Within Disciplines
and Faculty Assessment and Credentialing
http://guides.temple.edu/journal-citation-ranking
*
How to Create a Literature Review
http://guides.temple.edu/literature-review
*
Media Literacy and News Literacy
http://guides.temple.edu/medialit
*
How to Create a Meta-Analysis and a Systematic Review
http://guides.temple.edu/Meta-Analysis
*
NEWS: Newspapers News and News Archive Resources
*
Plain English Writing Books and Database Search Results
http://guides.temple.edu/plain-english
*
REFWORKS
http://guides.temple.edu/ref-works
*
STATISTICS:
Databases, Sources and Database Search Results
for Statisitical Data Compilations and Publications
Including an Extensive Section of United States
Government Agencies with Database Search Results
from Nineteen Database Search Links for Each Agency
*
http://guides.temple.edu/statistics-sources
*
Research Guide Directory : Discussion Group Directory
https://sites.google.com/site/researchguidesonsites/
*
*
[PDF] Evaluating Sources of Information
PK Hurley – Online Text and Course Materials – Citeseer
*
Articles
Writing Centers and Libraries: One-Stop Shopping for Better Term Papers
DOI:10.1080/02763870802101310
Rachel Cookea* & Carol Bledsoeb
pages 119-127
Published online: 12 Dec 2008
The Reference Librarian
Volume 49, Issue 2, 2008
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02763870802101310
*
MacDonald, A. B.
(2010).
Multiple Visions of the Research Paper:
How Compositionists and Librarians Understand, Represent, and Teach
the Research Process
(Doctoral dissertation, Auburn University).
https://etd.auburn.edu/handle/10415/2072
*
Donahue, A. E., and Gamtso, C.
(2010).
Term papers, Google, and library anxiety:
how can information literacy improve students’ research skills?.
*
*
DATABASE SEARCH RESULTS: Penn State Summon Search
2,767 results
(“term paper” OR “term papers” OR “research paper” OR “research papers”) AND (“source evaluation” OR “evaluating sources”)
.
.
Evaluating Sources: Overview
OWL Family of Sites > OWL > Research and Citation > Conducting Research >
Evaluating Sources of Information FROM PURDUE
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/553/01/
Related OWL Content
- Research and Citation
- Conducting Research
- Research Overview
- Conducting Primary Research
- Evaluating Sources of Information
- Overview
- Evaluating Bibliographic Citations
- Evaluation During Reading
- Print vs. Internet
- Searching the World Wide Web
- Internet References
- Archival Research
- Giving to the OWL
· Suggested Resources
.
.
Evaluating Sources to Answer a Research Question
You will want your research paper to be respected and credible.
Therefore, after you identify sources relevant to your research,
you need to determine whether they can help answer your research question.
There are four questions to ask when evaluating sources:
- How well does the source answer the research question?
- Is the information provided by an expert?
- Is the source valid?
- Is there a variety of sources?
FROM Suny Empire State College
OR
ESC Online Writing Center
- Onsite and Online Tutoring
- Submit a Paper
- Workshops and Events
- Writing Resources
.
.
Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper:
Evaluating Sources
USC Libraries
http://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide/evaluatesources
.
Types of Research Designs
Toggle Dropdown
1. Choosing a Research Problem
Toggle Dropdown
2. Preparing to Write
Toggle Dropdown
3. The Abstract
Toggle Dropdown
4. The Introduction
Toggle Dropdown
5. The Literature Review
Toggle Dropdown
6. The Methodology
Toggle Dropdown
7. The Results
Toggle Dropdown
8. The Discussion
Toggle Dropdown
9. The Conclusion
Toggle Dropdown
10. Proofreading Your Paper
Toggle Dropdown
11. Citing Sources
Toggle Dropdown
Annotated Bibliography
Giving an Oral Presentation
Toggle Dropdown
Grading Someone Else’s Paper
How to Manage Group Projects
Toggle Dropdown
Writing a Book Review
Toggle Dropdown
Writing a Case Study
Writing a Field Report
Toggle Dropdown
Writing a Policy Memo
Writing a Research Proposal
Acknowledgements
.
.
Elements of a Research Proposal and Report
2005 © David S. Walonick, Ph.D.
The Research Proposal and Report
- General
- Style, layout, and page formatting
- Outline of the chapters and sections
- Chapter I – Introduction
- Chapter II – Background
- Chapter III – Methodology
- Chapter IV – Results
- Chapter V – Conclusions and Recommendations
http://www.statpac.org/research-library/research-proposal.htm
.
.
How to Write the Methods Section of a Research Paper. – NCBI
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15447808
The methods section of a research paper provides
the information by which a study’s validity is judged.
Therefore, it requires a clear and precise description
of how an experiment was done, and the rationale for
why specific experimental procedures were chosen.
The methods section should describe what was done
to answer the research question, describe how it was
done, justify the experimental design, and explain how
the results were analyzed. Scientific writing is direct
and orderly. Therefore, the methods section structure
should: describe the materials used in the study, explain
how the materials were prepared for the study, describe
the research protocol, explain how measurements were
made and what calculations were performed, and state
which statistical tests were done to analyze the data.
Once all elements of the methods section are written,
subsequent drafts should focus on how to present those
elements as clearly and logically as possibly.
The description of preparations, measurements, and the
protocol should be organized chronologically. For clarity,
when a large amount of detail must be presented, information
should be presented in sub-sections according to topic.
Material in each section should be organized by topic from
most to least important.
.
.
EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE
Amber Huett and David MacMillan
June 2011
UNA Center for Writing Excellence
Evidence Based Practice in nursing focuses on the idea that medical practices ought to be developed and adapted based on an ongoing cycle of evidence, theory, and research. As changes in practice prompt further research, the theories developed from that research serve as evidence to
produce more changes in practice. The implementation of Evidence Based Practice in nursing, also called Systematic Review, requires the review of such research with the intention of targeting and improving inadequate practice.
The systematic review of outside research attempts to make sense of the large body of information available in order to implement change effectively. The available research may be qualitative, quantitative, or evidence based. How can this research be applied on an individual basis to improve patient care?
Evidence Based Practice involves the following six steps:
Assess the need for change
Locate the best evidence
Synthesize evidence
Design the change
Implement and evaluate
Integrate and maintain changes
https://www.una.edu/writingcenter/docs/Writing-Resources/Evidence-Based%20Practice.pdf
OR
.
.
McMillan, James H., and Sally Schumacher.
Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry.
Pearson Higher Ed, 2014.
.
Polit-O’Hara, Denise, and Cheryl Tatano Beck.
Essentials of nursing research:
Methods, appraisal, and utilization.
Vol. 1. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006.
.
Greenhalgh, Trisha.
How to read a paper:
The basics of evidence-based medicine.
John Wiley and Sons, 2014.
.
Grinnell Jr, Richard M., and Yvonne A. Unrau.
Social work research and evaluation:
Foundations of evidence-based practice.
Oxford University Press, 2010.
.
Sanderson, Ian.
“Is it ‘what works’ that matters?
Evaluation and evidence‐based policy‐making.”
Research papers in education 18, no. 4 (2003): 331-345.
*
Author Coleman, Vernon
Title PAPER DOCTORS: A CRITICAL ASSESSMENT OF MEDICAL RESEARCH
Place London
Publisher Temple Smith
Year 1977
Pages 170
ISBN 0-85117-109-5
Language English
Publication Type Book, booklet
Subject Area Applied and Professional Ethics – Scientific Research; Human Experimentation – General
Keywords (TELS) Wissenschaftliches Fehlverhalten*; Wissenschaftsethik*; Humanexperiment
scientific misconduct*; ethics of science*; human experimentation
*
Author Selvan, Mano S; Subbian, Saravana; Cantor, Scott B; Rodriguez, Alma; Smith, Martin L; Walsh, Garrett L
Title Ethics of transparency in research reports.
Source Indian journal of medical ethics
Volume/Issue Vol. 8 (1)
Year 2011
Publication Date 2011-01
Pages 31-6
ISSN 0974-8466
Language English
Publication Type Article (journal article)
Subject Area Policy Guidelines / Institutional Review Boards / Review Committees; Social Control of Human Experimentation
Keywords (TELS) Humanexperiment*; Richtlinie*; Humanexperiment; Soziale Kontrolle
human experimentation*; guidelines*; human experimentation; social control
Keywords (MeSH) Cost-Benefit Analysis; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Drug Evaluation/ statistics & numerical data; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Information Dissemination/ ethics*; Research Report*
Classification (BRL) 18.2*; 18.6
Abstract Transparency in research methods and results is now widely seen as an imperative if the healthcare and research enterprise is to be truly successful. A patient-centred focus in the conduct of clinical care includes its safety, effectiveness, efficiency, equity, and timeliness. Innovative ways are being developed to understand, disseminate, and rapidly apply the best evidence to care delivery. In this article, we demonstrate the use of simple and appropriate statistics in research reports that should help healthcare providers apply knowledge to practice by making it easier for them to understand clinical medicine.
*
Author Groves, T
Title What makes a high quality clinical research paper?
Source Oral diseases
Volume/Issue Vol. 16 (4)
Year 2010
Publication Date 2010-05
Pages 313-5
ISSN 1601-0825
Language English
Publication Type Article (journal article)
Subject Area Applied and Professional Ethics – Journalism / Mass Media; Policy Guidelines / Institutional Review Boards / Review Committees
Keywords (TELS) Publikationswesen*; Ethik*; Humanexperiment; Richtlinie
publishing*; ethics*; human experimentation; guidelines
Keywords (MeSH) Clinical Trials as Topic*; Ethics, Research*; Guidelines as Topic; Humans; Journalism, Medical/ standards*; Periodicals as Topic; Publishing/ standards*; Writing/ standards*
Classification (BRL) 1.3.7*; 18.2
Abstract The quality of a research paper depends primarily on the quality of the research study it reports. However, there is also much that authors can do to maximise the clarity and usefulness of their papers. Journals’ instructions for authors often focus on the format, style, and length of articles but do not always emphasise the need to clearly explain the work’s science and ethics: so this review reminds researchers that transparency is important too. The research question should be stated clearly, along with an explanation of where it came from and why it is important. The study methods must be reported fully and, where appropriate, in line with an evidence based reporting guideline such as the CONSORT statement for randomised controlled trials. If the study was a trial the paper should state where and when the study was registered and state its registration identifier. Finally, any relevant conflicts of interest should be declared.
*
EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE
Amber Huett and David MacMillan
June 2011
UNA Center for Writing Excellence
*
Evidence Based Practice in nursing focuses on the idea that medical practices ought to be developed and adapted based on an ongoing cycle of evidence, theory, and research. As changes in practice prompt further research, the theories developed from that research serve as evidence to
produce more changes in practice. The implementation of Evidence Based Practice in nursing, also called Systematic Review, requires the review of such research with the intention of targeting and improving inadequate practice.
The systematic review of outside research attempts to make sense of the large body of information available in order to implement change effectively. The available research may be qualitative, quantitative, or evidence based. How can this research be applied on an individual basis to improve patient care?
Evidence Based Practice involves the following six steps:
Assess the need for change
Locate the best evidence
Synthesize evidence
Design the change
Implement and evaluate
Integrate and maintain changes
https://www.una.edu/writingcenter/docs/Writing-Resources/Evidence-Based%20Practice.pdf
OR
*
McMillan, James H., and Sally Schumacher.
Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry.
Pearson Higher Ed, 2014.
*
Polit-O’Hara, Denise, and Cheryl Tatano Beck.
Essentials of nursing research:
Methods, appraisal, and utilization.
Vol. 1. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006.
*
Greenhalgh, Trisha.
How to read a paper:
The basics of evidence-based medicine.
John Wiley and Sons, 2014.
*
Grinnell Jr, Richard M., and Yvonne A. Unrau.
Social work research and evaluation:
Foundations of evidence-based practice.
Oxford University Press, 2010.
*
Sanderson, Ian.
“Is it ‘what works’ that matters?
Evaluation and evidence‐based policy‐making.”
Research papers in education 18, no. 4 (2003): 331-345.
*
*
==========================================
Database Search Results
for Source Evaluation for Research Reports
==========================================
*
*
Google Books
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (BLOGS)
========================================
Content Sample of SOURCES FOUND WITH
GOOGLE DOMAIN NAME WEB SEARCH (BLOGS)
========================================
*
Evid Based Nurs 2003;6:36-40 doi:10.1136/ebn.6.2.36
EBN users’ guide
Evaluation of qualitative research studies
http://ebn.bmj.com/content/6/2/36.fullCynthia K Russell, RN, ARNP, PhD1, David M Gregory, RN, PhD2
*
What’s Wrong with Wikipedia?
Harvard Guide to Using Sources
A Publication of the Harvard College Writing Program
Site Navigation
- Introduction
- Why Use Sources?
- Locating Sources
- Evaluating Sources
- Avoiding Plagiarism
- Integrating Sources
- Citing Sources
The Myth of the Off-Limits Source
by Chelsea Lee
http://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/research/
“Proper citation is an important component of any APA Style paper.
However, many readers believe certain sources aren’t allowed in
APA Style, and they write to us looking for a definitive list of what is
off limits. Two of the most common questions are about whether it’s
okay to cite websites and whether sources have to have been
published within a certain time frame to be cited, such as the last
5 or 10 years.”
Blog Post Contents
Reliable Sources
Primary Sources
Up-to-Date Sources
.
Additional Posts in this Group APA Blog Posts
April 02, 2015
Keywords in APA Style
by Timothy McAdoo
What are keywords?
.
February 04, 2015
How to Cite a Hashtag in #APAStyle
by Timothy McAdoo
Note: To learn how to cite individual tweets or posts that include hashtags, see our post on citing social media. This post is about how to talk about the hashtags themselves.
.
October 21, 2014
Student Webinars for Psychology: Tests and Measures & Statistics
.
May 09, 2014
Comparing MLA and APA: Citing Resources
.
October 24, 2013
How Do I Cite a Search in APA Style?
by Jeff Hume-Pratuch
.
snip
*
EPC Evidence-Based Reports | Agency for Healthcare Research
http://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/evidence-based-reports/index.html
Search All EPC Reports
This search provides complete titles of released evidence reports,
comparative effectiveness reviews, technical briefs, Technology
Assessment Program reports, and U.S. Preventive Services Task
Force evidence syntheses.
Overview
Under the Evidence-based Practice Centers (EPC) Program of
the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 5-year contracts
are awarded to institutions in the United States and Canada to
serve as EPCs. The EPCs review all relevant scientific literature on
a wide spectrum of clinical and health services topics to produce
various types of evidence reports. These reports may be used for
informing and developing coverage decisions, quality measures,
educational materials and tools, clinical practice guidelines, and
research agendas. The EPCs also conduct research on methodology
of evidence synthesis.
Participating EPCs
The following list provides contact information and Web sites
where available for the 13 Evidence-based Practice Centers
currently funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality.
EPC Topic Nomination and Selection
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) serves
as the science partner with private-sector and public organizations
in their efforts to improve the quality, effectiveness, and
appropriateness of health care delivery in the United States, and to
expedite the translation of evidence-based research findings into
improved health care services. In this context, AHRQ awards task
order contracts to its Evidence-based Practice Centers (EPCs) to
undertake scientific analysis and evidence syntheses on topics of
high priority to its stakeholders, which includes public and private
health care payers, providers, and the health care community in
general.
Resources for Researchers
EPCs produce technical reports on systematic review methodological
topics and other types of evidence synthesis-related reports such as
reports summarizing future research needs for a given topic.
In addition, EPCs, the Scientific Resource Center, and other
AHRQ-funded entities have produced tools and software to aid
researchers.
Effective Health Care Program Stakeholder Guide
Guide for partners in the Effective Health Care Program program.
Page last reviewed November 2016
Page originally created April 2013
Internet Citation: EPC Evidence-Based Reports. Content last reviewed
November 2016. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD.
http://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/evidence-based-reports/index.html
*
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources
This page documents an English Wikipedia content guideline.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_content_guidelines
Contents
- 2.1 Scholarship
- 2.2 News organizations
- 2.3 Vendor and e-commerce sources
- 2.4 Biased or opinionated sources
· 3 Questionable and self-published sources
- 3.1 Questionable sources
- 3.2 Self-published sources (online and paper)
- 3.3 Self-published and questionable sources as sources on themselves
· 4 Reliability in specific contexts
- 4.1 Biographies of living persons
- 4.2 Primary, secondary, and tertiary sources
- 4.3 Medical claims
- 4.4 Quotations
- 4.5 Academic consensus
- 4.6 Usage by other sources
- 4.7 Statements of opinion
- 4.8 Breaking news
· 6 Notes
*
References for College Papers
Steven Dutch, Natural and Applied Sciences, University of Wisconsin – Green Bay
First – time Visitors: Please visit Site Map and Disclaimer.
https://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/paperref.htm
“General Principles for References
- Use the most original source possible.
- Use the most up-to-date and reliable source available.
- Your paper is only as good as its weakest source.”
.
snip
.
The Following ARE Acceptable References
- Scholarly Periodicals
- Scholarly Books
- Reputable Translations of Foreign Works
- Student Theses
- Research Forums or Hotlines on the Internet
- Internet Periodicals by Reputable Organizations
Most of the information in academia does not flow through books! The real information flow is through periodicals. Even here, acceptability varies. Scientific American is acceptable for most college research papers, but not for a graduate thesis.
Scholarly books serve several purposes:
- They collect related articles on a subject from scattered sources.
- They contain specially-written articles contributed by various authorities to summarize the state of research on a subject.
- They summarize the results of research over a long period of time that would be too lengthy to publish as a periodical article. They can also include details that would be too obscure to merit inclusion in a journal article.
*
Why the “Research Paper” Isn’t Working
I recently returned from a brief encounter with some fascinating ideas at “4Cs” – the annual meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication.
By
April 12, 2011
Inside Higher Ed
*
Brain-Work: The C-EBLIP Blog
The Centre for Evidence Based Library and Information Practice (C-EBLIP) blog with topics related to research, evidence based library and information practice, and librarianship
More Data Please! Research Methods, Libraries, and Geospatial Data Catalogs: C-EBLIP Journal Club, August 25, 2016
Posted on October 4, 2016
by Kristin Bogdan
Engineering and GIS Librarian
University Library, University of Saskatchewan
https://words.usask.ca/ceblipblog/tag/research-paper/
*
Evaluating scientific research quality for better skeptical analysis
2015/05/07 The Original Skeptical Raptor
Contents
Where to find real science information?
Impact factor and peer review
Authorities or experts
Science or Not also provided a “checklist” of Red Flags or warning signs of a non-expert
Hierarchy of evidence
—————-
Therefore, what are the highest quality types of evidence? In order of best to worst,
Secondary reviews published in peer-reviewed, high-impact journals.
Cohort studies (retrospective studies).
Case-control studies.
Cross sectional surveys.
Case reports
Animal or cell culture studies.
Meeting abstract or poster presentation.
Press releases or news reports.
—————-
Clinical significance
The TL;DR version
Key citations
================================================================
MORE DATABASE SEARCH RESULTS FOR Source Evaluation for Research Reports
================================================================
*
Google News
*
Google Images
*
Google Videos
*
Penn State Summon Search
407,483 results
- Archival Material (30) Include Exclude
- Audio Recording (2) Include Exclude
- Book / eBook (251,937) Include Exclude
- Book Chapter (8,773) Include Exclude
- Book Review (3,022) Include Exclude
- Catalog (4) Include Exclude
- Conference Proceeding (1,542) Include Exclude
- Data Set (116) Include Exclude
- Dissertation/Thesis (18,693) Include Exclude
- Electronic Resource (78) Include Exclude
- Government Document (913) Include Exclude
- Journal / eJournal (6) Include Exclude
- Journal Article (104,171) Include Exclude
- Magazine (1) Include Exclude
- Magazine Article (1,379) Include Exclude
- Manuscript (4) Include Exclude
- Market Research (615) Include Exclude
- Microform (5) Include Exclude
- Newsletter (1,573) Include Exclude
- Newspaper (51) Include Exclude
- Newspaper Article (15,613) Include Exclude
- Pamphlet (1) Include Exclude
- Paper (295) Include Exclude
- Patent (1) Include Exclude
- Poster (1) Include Exclude
- Presentation (2) Include Exclude
- Publication (158) Include Exclude
- Reference (1,897) Include Exclude
- Report (523) Include Exclude
- Research Guide (1,642) Include Exclude
- Special Collection (2) Include Exclude
- Standard (14) Include Exclude
- Student Thesis (8) Include Exclude
- Technical Report (22) Include Exclude
- Trade Publication Article (1,151) Include Exclude
- Transcript (152) Include Exclude
- Web Resource (359) Include Exclude
*
Purdue Primo Database FROM Proquest / ExLibris
170,935 for Everything
*
TRIP Database
*
PogoFrog
*
PLOS Database
*
United States
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Database
*
PUBMED
*
BioMed Central
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (GOV)
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (ORG)
Google Domain Limited Web Search (EDU)
*
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (PUBMED)
*
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (SCIENCEDIRECT)
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (JSTOR)
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (NEWS)
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (IMAGES)
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (VIDEOS)
*
========================================
https://sites.google.com/site/researchguidesonsites/
========================================
SOURCE EVALUATION : EVALUATING SOURCES :
TERM PAPERS : RESEACH PAPERS : RESEARCH DESIGN :
RESEARCH METHODS : TEACHING RESEARCH SKILLS:
A Selective Bibliography of Sources That Teach
Source Evaluation for Research Papers and
Instruct How to Teach Source Evaluation
.
.
SOURCE EVALUATION :
EVALUATING SOURCES :
TERM PAPERS :
RESEACH PAPERS :
RESEARCH DESIGN :
RESEARCH METHODS :
TEACHING RESEARCH SKILLS:
A Selective Bibliography of Sources That Teach Source Evaluation
for Research Papers and Instruct How to Teach Source Evaluation
.
.
WEBBIB1516
.
.
A Selective Bibliography of Sources That Teach Source Evaluation
for Research Papers and Instruct How to Teach Source Evaluation
.
.
Successful Strategies for Teaching Undergraduate Research
Editors Marta Deyrup, Beth Bloom
Publisher Scarecrow Press, 2013
ISBN 0810887177, 9780810887176
Length 204 pages
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Undergraduates and library research: what’s changed, what hasn’t, what now? /
Mary W. George —
The State of Teaching Today. Research questions and the research question:
what are we teaching when we teach research? /
Heidi L.M. Jacobs —
Understanding the relationship between good research and good writing /
Barbara J. D’Angelo —
Toward the “good” research assignment: a librarian speaks /
Roberta Tipton —
Toward the “good” research assignment: an academic speaks /
Willilamjames Hull Hoffer —
Teaching new media as a form of writing: explorations in evolving genres /
James Elmborg —
From punitive policing to proactive prevention: approaches to teaching information
ethics in the college classroom / Maria T. Accardi —
Assessing the information research process /
Stephanie Sterling Brasley. —
The Strategies in Action: Four Ideas That Work. Sources before search:
a scaffolded approach to teaching research /
Stephanie N. Otis —
RAIDS for research /
Sara D Miller, Nancy C. DeJoy, Benjamin M. Oberdock —
College students as Wikipedia editors: new pathways to information literacy /
Davida Scharf —
Training the trainer: librarians as faculty coaches and workshop designers /
Beth Bloom.
.
The Research Paper: A Guide to Library and Internet Research
Authors Dawn Rodrigues, Raymond J. Rodrigues
Edition 3, illustrated
Publisher Prentice Hall, 2003
ISBN 0130982563, 9780130982568
Length 259 pages
.
Research Papers
Authors William Coyle, Joe Law
Edition 16
Publisher Cengage Learning, 2013
ISBN 1133713017, 9781133713012
Length 272 pages
.
Building Better Essays
Cengage Advantage Books
New 1st Editions in Developmental English Series
Author Gina Hogan
Publisher Cengage Learning, 2012
ISBN 0495905178, 9780495905172
Length 272 pages
.
Quality Research Papers:
For Students of Religion and Theology
Authors
Nancy Jean Vyhmeister, Terry Dwain Robertson
Publisher Harper Collins, 2014
ISBN 0310514037, 9780310514039
Length 304 pages
.
Real Essays with Readings:
Writing for Success in College, Work, and Everyday Life
Author Susan Anker
Publisher Macmillan, 2011
ISBN 0312648081, 9780312648084
Length 912 pages
.
Research Paper Handbook: Your Complete Guide
Research Paper Handbook Series
Author James D. Lester
Publisher Good Year Books, 2005
ISBN 1596470763, 9781596470767
Length 232 pages
.
Writing the Research Paper: A Handbook
Authors Anthony Winkler, Jo Ray McCuen-Metherell
Edition 7, illustrated
Publisher Cengage Learning, 2007
ISBN 1413011713, 9781413011715
Length 360 pages
.
Writing the Research Paper: A Handbook
Authors
Anthony C. Winkler, Jo Ray McCuen-Metherell
Edition 8
Publisher Cengage Learning, 2011
ISBN 1133169023, 9781133169024
Length 360 pages
.
Principles of Writing Research Papers
Penguin academics
Author James D. Lester
Edition 2, illustrated
Publisher Penguin Academics, 2007
Original from the University of Virginia
Digitized Nov 24, 2009
ISBN 032142610X, 9780321426109
Length 266 pages
.
Writing, Reading, and Research
Authors Richard Veit, Christopher Gould
Edition 8, illustrated
Publisher Cengage Learning, 2009
ISBN 0547191049, 9780547191041
Length 640 pages
.
The Johns Hopkins Guide to Digital Media
UPCC book collections on Project MUSE
Author Marie-Laure Ryan
Editors Marie-Laure Ryan, Lori Emerson, Benjamin J. Robertson
Edition illustrated
Publisher JHU Press, 2013
ISBN 142141225X, 9781421412252
Length 553 pages
.
MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers
Authors
Joseph Gibaldi,
Modern Language Association of America
Edition 4, illustrated, reprint
Publisher
Modern Language Association of America, 1995
ISBN 0873525655, 9780873525657
Length 293 pages
.
A Manual for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations,
Seventh Edition:
Chicago Style for Students and Researchers
Chicago Guides to Writing, Editing, and
Author Kate L. Turabian
Contributors Wayne C. Booth, Gregory G. Colomb,
Joseph M. Williams, Wayne C. University of Chicago Press Staff
Edition revised
Publisher University of Chicago Press, 2009
ISBN 0226823385, 9780226823386
Length 436 pages
.
The Sundance Writer:
A Rhetoric, Reader, and Research Guide, Brief
Author Mark Connelly
Edition 5
Publisher Cengage Learning, 2012
ISBN 113371370X, 9781133713708
Length 752 pages
.
The Wadsworth Handbook
Authors Laurie G. Kirszner, Stephen R. Mandell
Edition 10
Publisher Cengage Learning, 2013
ISBN 1285500121, 9781285500126
Length 864 pages
.
Usability of Complex Information Systems:
Evaluation of User Interaction
Editors Michael Albers, Brian Still
Edition illustrated
Publisher CRC Press, 2010
ISBN 1439828954, 9781439828953
Length 399 pages
.
Fusion: Integrated Reading and Writing, Book 2
Authors
Dave Kemper, Verne Meyer, John Van Rys, Patrick Sebranek
Edition 2
Publisher Cengage Learning, 2015
ISBN 1305537947, 9781305537941
Length 656 pages
.
Quick Access: Essays and Term Papers
Quick Access
Author Research and Education Association
Publisher Research & Education Assoc., 2009
ISBN 0738607282, 9780738607283
Length 4 pages
.
A Guide to MLA Documentation
Author Joseph F. Trimmer
Edition 9, illustrated, annotated
Publisher Cengage Learning, 2012
ISBN 1111837074, 9781111837075
Length 48 pages
.
Insightful Writing: A Process Rhetoric with Readings
Authors David Sabrio, Mitchell Burchfield
Edition illustrated
Publisher Cengage Learning, 2008
ISBN 0618870261, 9780618870264
Length 336 pages
.
The Chicago Manual of Style
Author University of Chicago. Press
Contributor University of Chicago
Publisher University of Chicago Press, 2003
ISBN 0226104036, 9780226104034
.
The Curious Researcher:
A Guide to Writing Research Papers
Author Bruce Ballenger
Edition 7, illustrated
Publisher Pearson Education, 2011
ISBN 0205172873, 9780205172870
Length 348 pages
.
Writing Research Papers Across the Curriculum
Advantage (Thomson)
Advantage series
Author Susan M. Hubbuch
Edition 5, illustrated
Publisher Thomson Wadsworth, 2004
ISBN 1413002374, 9781413002379
Length 450 pages
.
Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper: Evaluating Sources
University of Southern California Libraries
http://libguides.usc.edu/c.php?g=235034&p=1561749
Purpose of Guide
Types of Research Designs
- Choosing a Research Problem
- Preparing to Write
- The Abstract
- The Introduction
- The Literature Review
- The Methodology
- The Results
Using Non-Textual Elements
- The Discussion
- The Conclusion
- Proofreading Your Paper
- Citing Sources
Annotated Bibliography
Giving an Oral Presentation
Grading Someone Else’s Paper
How to Manage Group Projects
Writing a Book Review
Writing a Case Study
Writing a Field Report
Writing a Policy Memo
Writing a Research Proposa
http://libguides.usc.edu/c.php?g=235034&p=1561749
.
.
.
How to Write a Research Paper
http://guides.temple.edu/research-papers
.
How to Write an Annotated Bibliography
http://guides.temple.edu/annotated-bibliographies
.
How to Find and Write Book Reviews:
Databases and Search Engine Searches for Finding Book Reviews
http://guides.temple.edu/bkrev
.
Digital Humanities and Digital Initiatives Sources
http://guides.temple.edu/digital-humanities
.
DISSERTATIONS: Finding and Writing Dissertations and Theses
http://guides.temple.edu/dissertations
.
Faculty Credentialing
http://guides.temple.edu/FacultyCredentialing
.
GOVERNMENT PUBLICATION MANUALS :
Government Writing Manuals Guides and Handbooks
http://guides.temple.edu/GovWritingManuals
.
Grey Literature Sources and Tools
http://guides.temple.edu/grey-literature
.
INFORMATION LITERACY AND FRIENDS
.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT GUIDE SERIES:
COPYRIGHT, Intellectual Property and Plagiarism Sources
http://guides.temple.edu/copyright-plagiarism
.
Fair Use Under Copyright Law:
Fair Use Books, Websites and Database Search Results
http://guides.temple.edu/fair-use
.
JOURNAL CITATION RANKING SUBJECT LISTS FEATURING SCIMAGO:
Citation Analysis, Journal Rankings and Rankings Within Disciplines
and Faculty Assessment and Credentialing
http://guides.temple.edu/journal-citation-ranking
.
How to Create a Literature Review
http://guides.temple.edu/literature-review
.
Media Literacy and News Literacy
http://guides.temple.edu/medialit
.
How to Create a Meta-Analysis and a Systematic Review
http://guides.temple.edu/Meta-Analysis
.
NEWS: Newspapers News and News Archive Resources
.
Plain English Writing Books and Database Search Results
http://guides.temple.edu/plain-english
.
REFWORKS
http://guides.temple.edu/ref-works
STATISTICS:
Databases, Sources and Database Search Results
for Statisitical Data Compilations and Publications
Including an Extensive Section of United States
Government Agencies with Database Search Results
from Nineteen Database Search Links for Each Agency
http://guides.temple.edu/statistics-sources
.
Research Guide Directory : Discussion Group Directory
https://sites.google.com/site/researchguidesonsites/
.
.
[PDF] Evaluating Sources of Information
PK Hurley – Online Text and Course Materials – Citeseer
.
Articles
Writing Centers and Libraries: One-Stop Shopping for Better Term Papers
DOI:10.1080/02763870802101310
Rachel Cookea* & Carol Bledsoeb
pages 119-127
Published online: 12 Dec 2008
The Reference Librarian
Volume 49, Issue 2, 2008
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02763870802101310
.
MacDonald, A. B.
(2010).
Multiple Visions of the Research Paper:
How Compositionists and Librarians Understand, Represent, and Teach
the Research Process
(Doctoral dissertation, Auburn University).
https://etd.auburn.edu/handle/10415/2072
.
Donahue, A. E., and Gamtso, C.
(2010).
Term papers, Google, and library anxiety:
how can information literacy improve students’ research skills?.
.
DATABASE SEARCH RESULTS: Temple Summon Search
.
The Critical Assessment of Research:
Traditional and New Methods of Evaluation
Chandos information professional series
Authors Alan Bailin, Ann Grafstein
Publisher Chandos, 2010
Original from University of Chicago
Digitized Apr 18, 2011
ISBN 1843345439, 9781843345435
Length 121 pages
*
Educational Research:
Why ‘What Works’ Doesn’t Work
Volume 1 of Educational Research
Editors Paul Smeyers, Marc Depaepe
Edition illustrated, reprint
Publisher
Springer Science & Business Media, 2007
ISBN 1402053088, 9781402053085
Length 196 pages
*
Managing Quality in Qualitative Research
Qualitative Research Kit
Author Uwe Flick
Edition reprint
Publisher SAGE, 2008
ISBN 144620524X, 9781446205242
Length 160 pages
*
A Bird’s-Eye View of Assessment:
Selections from Editor’s Notes
Volume 10 of Assessment Update Special Collections
Editor Trudy W. Banta
Publisher John Wiley & Sons, 2011
ISBN 1118109155, 9781118109151
Length 96 pages
*
“evaluation of research” OR “evaluating research” OR “research evaluation” OR (assessment AND “quality of research”)
*
Handbook of Family Literacy
Editor Barbara Hanna Wasik
Edition illustrated, reprint
Publisher Routledge, 2012
ISBN 0415884578, 9780415884570
Length 479 pages
*
Organizations and Strategies in Astronomy, Volume 3
Volume 256; Volume 266; Volume 280; Volume 296;
Volume 310 of Astrophysics and Space Science Library :
a series of books on the recent developments of space
science and of general geophysics and astrophysics
Astrophysics and Space Science Library, ISSN 0067-0057
Organizations and Strategies in Astronomy, André Heck
Editor Andre Heck
Edition illustrated
Publisher Springer Science & Business Media, 2002
ISBN 1402008120, 9781402008122
Length 238 pages
*
Library Assessment in Higher Education
Author Joseph R. Matthews
Publisher Greenwood Publishing Group, 2007
ISBN 031309487X, 9780313094873
Length 146 pages
*
Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research:
The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems
Editors Henk F. Moed, Wolfgang Glänzel, Ulrich Schmoch
Edition illustrated
Publisher Springer Science & Business Media, 2004
ISBN 1402027028, 9781402027024
Length 800 pages
*
Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation
Volume 9 of Information Science and Knowledge Management
Author Henk F. Moed
Edition illustrated
Publisher Springer Science & Business Media, 2006
ISBN 1402037147, 9781402037146
Length 348 pages
*
Evidence-Based Prevention
Prevention Practice Kit
Editors Katherine Raczynski,
Michael Waldo, Jonathan P. Schwartz,
Arthur M. Horne
Publisher SAGE Publications, 2012
ISBN 1483307654, 9781483307657
Length 96 pages
*
The SAGE Handbook of Social Work Research
Sage Handbooks
Author Ian Shaw
Edition illustrated
Publisher SAGE Publications, 2009
ISBN 1412934982, 9781412934985
Length 572 pages
*
An Introduction to Qualitative Research
Author Uwe Flick
Publisher SAGE, 2009
ISBN 1446241319, 9781446241318
Length 528 pages
*
Issues in Discovery, Experimental,
and Laboratory Medicine:
2011 Edition
Contributor Q. Ashton Acton, PhD
Publisher ScholarlyEditions, 2012
ISBN 1464963509, 9781464963506
Length 3453 pages
*
The Quality of Qualitative Research
Introducing Qualitative Methods series
Author Clive Seale
Publisher SAGE, 1999
ISBN 144627621X, 9781446276211
Length 224 pages
*
How to Do Research: A Psychologist’s Guide
Author Jonathan St. B. T. Evans
Edition illustrated
Publisher Taylor & Francis, 2005
ISBN 1841695424, 9781841695426
Length 126 pages
*
.
Purpose of Guide
Types of Research Designs
- Choosing a Research Problem
- Preparing to Write
- The Abstract
- The Introduction
- The Literature Review
- The Methodology
- The Results
Using Non-Textual Elements
- The Discussion
- The Conclusion
- Proofreading Your Paper
- Citing Sources
Annotated Bibliography
Giving an Oral Presentation
Grading Someone Else’s Paper
How to Manage Group Projects
Writing a Book Review
Writing a Case Study
Writing a Field Report
Writing a Policy Memo
Writing a Research Proposa
http://libguides.usc.edu/c.php?g=235034&p=1561749
.
.
.
How to Write a Research Paper
http://guides.temple.edu/research-papers
.
How to Write an Annotated Bibliography
http://guides.temple.edu/annotated-bibliographies
.
How to Find and Write Book Reviews:
Databases and Search Engine Searches for Finding Book Reviews
http://guides.temple.edu/bkrev
.
Digital Humanities and Digital Initiatives Sources
http://guides.temple.edu/digital-humanities
.
DISSERTATIONS: Finding and Writing Dissertations and Theses
http://guides.temple.edu/dissertations
.
Faculty Credentialing
http://guides.temple.edu/FacultyCredentialing
.
GOVERNMENT PUBLICATION MANUALS :
Government Writing Manuals Guides and Handbooks
http://guides.temple.edu/GovWritingManuals
.
Grey Literature Sources and Tools
http://guides.temple.edu/grey-literature
.
INFORMATION LITERACY AND FRIENDS
.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT GUIDE SERIES:
COPYRIGHT, Intellectual Property and Plagiarism Sources
http://guides.temple.edu/copyright-plagiarism
.
Fair Use Under Copyright Law:
Fair Use Books, Websites and Database Search Results
http://guides.temple.edu/fair-use
.
JOURNAL CITATION RANKING SUBJECT LISTS FEATURING SCIMAGO:
Citation Analysis, Journal Rankings and Rankings Within Disciplines
and Faculty Assessment and Credentialing
http://guides.temple.edu/journal-citation-ranking
.
How to Create a Literature Review
http://guides.temple.edu/literature-review
.
Media Literacy and News Literacy
http://guides.temple.edu/medialit
.
How to Create a Meta-Analysis and a Systematic Review
http://guides.temple.edu/Meta-Analysis
.
NEWS: Newspapers News and News Archive Resources
.
Plain English Writing Books and Database Search Results
http://guides.temple.edu/plain-english
.
REFWORKS
http://guides.temple.edu/ref-works
STATISTICS:
Databases, Sources and Database Search Results
for Statisitical Data Compilations and Publications
Including an Extensive Section of United States
Government Agencies with Database Search Results
from Nineteen Database Search Links for Each Agency
http://guides.temple.edu/statistics-sources
.
Research Guide Directory : Discussion Group Directory
https://sites.google.com/site/researchguidesonsites/
.
.
[PDF] Evaluating Sources of Information
PK Hurley – Online Text and Course Materials – Citeseer
.
Articles
Writing Centers and Libraries: One-Stop Shopping for Better Term Papers
DOI:10.1080/02763870802101310
Rachel Cookea* & Carol Bledsoeb
pages 119-127
Published online: 12 Dec 2008
The Reference Librarian
Volume 49, Issue 2, 2008
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02763870802101310
.
MacDonald, A. B.
(2010).
Multiple Visions of the Research Paper:
How Compositionists and Librarians Understand, Represent, and Teach
the Research Process
(Doctoral dissertation, Auburn University).
https://etd.auburn.edu/handle/10415/2072
.
Donahue, A. E., and Gamtso, C.
(2010).
Term papers, Google, and library anxiety:
how can information literacy improve students’ research skills?.
.
DATABASE SEARCH RESULTS: Penn State Summon Search
(“term paper” OR “term papers” OR “research paper” OR “research papers”)
AND (“source evaluation” OR “evaluating sources”)
2,774 results
Source Types
- Book / eBook (1,960) Include Exclude
- Book Chapter (32) Include Exclude
- Book Review (21) Include Exclude
- Conference Proceeding (5) Include Exclude
- Dissertation/Thesis (52) Include Exclude
- Government Document (3) Include Exclude
- Journal Article (335) Include Exclude
- Magazine Article (7) Include Exclude
- Newsletter (2) Include Exclude
- Newspaper Article (15) Include Exclude
- Poster (1) Include Exclude
- Reference (23) Include Exclude
- Report (1) Include Exclude
- Research Guide (347) Include Exclude
- Trade Publication Article (2) Include Exclude
- Web Resource (3) Include Exclude
Content Sample
MLA handbook for writers of research papers
Book: Stacks – General Collection, LB2369.M165 1999, Penn State Beaver (+8 More)
MLA handbook for writers of research papers
on MLA documentation style. Widely adopted in high schools, colleges, and…
The elements of library research: what every student needs to know
This short, practical book introduces students to the important…
10 steps in writing the research paper
The Little, Brown guide to writing research papers
Writing Centers and Libraries: One-Stop Shopping for Better Term Papers
Beyond Consultation: A New Model for Librarian’s Office Hours
Writing a research paper: students explain their process
Writing research papers: a complete guide
.
.
.
The Critical Assessment of Research:
Traditional and New Methods of Evaluation
Chandos information professional series
Authors Alan Bailin, Ann Grafstein
Publisher Chandos, 2010
Original from University of Chicago
Digitized Apr 18, 2011
ISBN 1843345439, 9781843345435
Length 121 pages
*
Educational Research:
Why ‘What Works’ Doesn’t Work
Volume 1 of Educational Research
Editors Paul Smeyers, Marc Depaepe
Edition illustrated, reprint
Publisher
Springer Science & Business Media, 2007
ISBN 1402053088, 9781402053085
Length 196 pages
*
Managing Quality in Qualitative Research
Qualitative Research Kit
Author Uwe Flick
Edition reprint
Publisher SAGE, 2008
ISBN 144620524X, 9781446205242
Length 160 pages
*
A Bird’s-Eye View of Assessment:
Selections from Editor’s Notes
Volume 10 of Assessment Update Special Collections
Editor Trudy W. Banta
Publisher John Wiley & Sons, 2011
ISBN 1118109155, 9781118109151
Length 96 pages
*
“evaluation of research” OR “evaluating research” OR “research evaluation” OR (assessment AND “quality of research”)
*
Handbook of Family Literacy
Editor Barbara Hanna Wasik
Edition illustrated, reprint
Publisher Routledge, 2012
ISBN 0415884578, 9780415884570
Length 479 pages
*
Organizations and Strategies in Astronomy, Volume 3
Volume 256; Volume 266; Volume 280; Volume 296;
Volume 310 of Astrophysics and Space Science Library :
a series of books on the recent developments of space
science and of general geophysics and astrophysics
Astrophysics and Space Science Library, ISSN 0067-0057
Organizations and Strategies in Astronomy, André Heck
Editor Andre Heck
Edition illustrated
Publisher Springer Science & Business Media, 2002
ISBN 1402008120, 9781402008122
Length 238 pages
*
Library Assessment in Higher Education
Author Joseph R. Matthews
Publisher Greenwood Publishing Group, 2007
ISBN 031309487X, 9780313094873
Length 146 pages
*
Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research:
The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems
Editors Henk F. Moed, Wolfgang Glänzel, Ulrich Schmoch
Edition illustrated
Publisher Springer Science & Business Media, 2004
ISBN 1402027028, 9781402027024
Length 800 pages
*
Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation
Volume 9 of Information Science and Knowledge Management
Author Henk F. Moed
Edition illustrated
Publisher Springer Science & Business Media, 2006
ISBN 1402037147, 9781402037146
Length 348 pages
*
Evidence-Based Prevention
Prevention Practice Kit
Editors Katherine Raczynski,
Michael Waldo, Jonathan P. Schwartz,
Arthur M. Horne
Publisher SAGE Publications, 2012
ISBN 1483307654, 9781483307657
Length 96 pages
*
The SAGE Handbook of Social Work Research
Sage Handbooks
Author Ian Shaw
Edition illustrated
Publisher SAGE Publications, 2009
ISBN 1412934982, 9781412934985
Length 572 pages
An Introduction to Qualitative Research
Author Uwe Flick
Publisher SAGE, 2009
ISBN 1446241319, 9781446241318
Length 528 pages
*
Issues in Discovery, Experimental,
and Laboratory Medicine:
2011 Edition
Contributor Q. Ashton Acton, PhD
Publisher ScholarlyEditions, 2012
ISBN 1464963509, 9781464963506
Length 3453 pages
*
The Quality of Qualitative Research
Introducing Qualitative Methods series
Author Clive Seale
Publisher SAGE, 1999
ISBN 144627621X, 9781446276211
Length 224 pages
*
How to Do Research: A Psychologist’s Guide
Author Jonathan St. B. T. Evans
Edition illustrated
Publisher Taylor & Francis, 2005
ISBN 1841695424, 9781841695426
Length 126 pages
*
Assessing Faculty Work: Enhancing Individual and Institutional Performance.
Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. Jossey-Bass Inc.,
350 Sansome Street, San Francisco, CA 94104, 1994.
*
“Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews:
a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool
and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research.”
Journal of evaluation in clinical practice 18, no. 1 (2012): 12-18.
*
“Publish and perish?
Bibliometric analysis, journal ranking and the assessment of research quality in tourism.”
Tourism Management 32, no. 1 (2011): 16-27.
*
“What are quality of life measurements measuring?.”
BMJ: British Medical Journal 316, no. 7130 (1998): 542.
*
Assessing the quality of research.”
BMJ: British Medical Journal 328, no. 7430 (2004): 39.
*
“Association of journal quality indicators with methodological quality of clinical research articles.”
JAMA 287, no. 21 (2002): 2805-2808.
*
“Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment:
enabling reuse for clinical research.”
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 20, no. 1 (2013): 144-151.
Jeremy Grimshaw, David A. Henry, and Maarten Boers.
“AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool
to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews.”
Journal of clinical epidemiology 62, no. 10 (2009): 1013-1020.
*
“Auditing quality of research in social sciences.”
Quality & Quantity 42, no. 2 (2008): 257-274.
*
“What’s in a number? Issues in providing evidence of impact and quality of research (ers).”
Qualitative Health Research 16, no. 3 (2006): 423-435.
*
Oxman, Andrew D., and Gordon H. Guyatt.
“Validation of an index of the quality of review articles.”
Journal of clinical epidemiology 44, no. 11 (1991): 1271-1278.
*
Quality of life research: A critical introduction.
Sage, 2003.
*
“The effects of medical school curricula, faculty role models, and biomedical research support
on choice of generalist physician careers: a review and quality assessment of the literature.”
Academic Medicine 70, no. 7 (1995): 611-9.
*
“The assessment of quality in higher education: A critical review of the literature and research.”
Research in higher education 24, no. 3 (1986): 223-265.
*
“The assessment of research quality in UK universities: Peer review or metrics?.”
British Journal of Management 22, no. 2 (2011): 202-217.
*
Review of research assessment.
London: RA Review, 2003.
*
“A classification and evaluation of research in operations management.”
Journal of Operations Management 1, no. 1 (1980): 9-14.
*
“Quality in qualitative research.”
Qualitative inquiry 5, no. 4 (1999): 465-478.
*
BMJ: British Medical Journal 323, no. 7312 (2001): 528.
*
“Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability.”
Human communication research 28, no. 4 (2002): 587-604.
*
“A systematic and transparent approach for assessing
the methodological quality of intervention effectiveness research:
the Study Design and Implementation Assessment Device (Study DIAD).”
Psychological methods 13, no. 2 (2008): 130.
*
“Assessing quality in applied and practice-based educational research: A framework for discussion.”
Review of Australian research in education: counterpoints on the quality and impact of educational research––
a special issue of the Australian Educational Researcher 6 (2005): 89-104.
*
“Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review.”
Bmj 326, no. 7400 (2003): 1167-1170.
*
“A review of research on fidelity of implementation:
implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings.”
Health education research 18, no. 2 (2003): 237-256.
*
“Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence.”
Obstetrics & Gynecology 114, no. 6 (2009): 1341-1345.
*
“University research evaluation and funding: An international comparison.”
Minerva 41, no. 4 (2003): 277-304.
*
Tasha Stanton, and David J. Magee.
“Scales to assess the quality of randomized controlled trials: a systematic review.”
Physical therapy 88, no. 2 (2008): 156.
*
“Are international co-publications an indicator for quality of scientific research?.”
Scientometrics 74, no. 3 (2007): 361-377.
*
“Quality of reporting of observational longitudinal research.”
American Journal of Epidemiology 161, no. 3 (2005): 280-288.
*
“Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology:
a systematic review and annotated bibliography.”
International journal of epidemiology 36, no. 3 (2007): 666-676.
*
“The UK Research Assessment Exercise:
the evolution of a national research evaluation system.”
Research Evaluation 16, no. 1 (2007): 3-12.
*
“The UK research assessment exercise: unintended consequences.”
Higher Education Quarterly 54, no. 3 (2000): 274-283.
*
“The future of research evaluation
rests with an intelligent combination of advanced metrics and transparent peer review.”
Science and Public Policy (SPP) 34, no. 8 (2007).
*
“The GRIPP checklist: strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research.”
International journal of technology assessment in health care 27, no. 04 (2011): 391-399.
*
“Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research.”
Qualitative health research 8, no. 3 (1998): 341-351.
“Health information literacy and competencies of information age students:
results from the interactive online Research Readiness Self-Assessment (RRSA).”
Journal of Medical Internet Research 8, no. 2 (2006): e6.
*
“The utilisation of health research in policy-making:
concepts, examples and methods of assessment.”
Health research policy and systems 1, no. 1 (2003): 2.
*
“Producing spaces for academic discourse:
The impact of research assessment exercises and journal quality rankings.”
Australian Accounting Review 20, no. 1 (2010): 38-54.
*
“Weight of evidence: a framework for the appraisal of the quality and relevance of evidence.”
Research papers in education 22, no. 2 (2007): 213-228.
*
“The Research Assessment Exercise,
the state and the dominance of mainstream economics in British universities.”
Cambridge Journal of Economics 31, no. 2 (2007): 309-325.
*
Assessing the quality of educational research in higher education: International perspectives.
Sense Publishers, 2009.
*
“Judging research quality.”
The handbook of research synthesis (1994): 97-109.
*
“‘Never mind the quality, feel the impact’: a methodological assessment of teacher research
sponsored by the Teacher Training Agency.”
British Journal of Educational Studies 47, no. 4 (1999): 380-398.
*
“Judging the quality of research in business schools: The UK as a case study.”
Omega 23, no. 3 (1995): 257-270.
*
“Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review.”
BMC medical research methodology 9, no. 1 (2009): 59.
*
“Accreditation, commercial rankings, and new approaches
to assessing the quality of university research and education programmes in the United States.”
Higher Education in Europe 27, no. 4 (2002): 433-441.
*
“Dissertation research in public administration and cognate fields:
An assessment of methods and quality.”
Public Administration Review (1994): 565-576.
*
“An empirical study of the possible relation of treatment differences to quality scores
in controlled randomized clinical trials.”
Controlled clinical trials 11, no. 5 (1990): 339-352.
*
“Value efficiency analysis of academic research.”
European Journal of Operational Research 130, no. 1 (2001): 121-132.
*
“Evidence-based burn care—an assessment of the methodological quality of research published
in burn care journals from 1982 to 2008.”
Burns 36, no. 8 (2010): 1190-1195.
*
“Quality of inferences in mixed methods research: Calling for an integrative framework.”
Advances in mixed methods research (2008): 101-119.
*
“Evolving regimes of multi-university research evaluation.”
Higher Education 57, no. 4 (2009): 393-404.
*
Jin, Bihui, and Ronald Rousseau.
“Evaluation of research performance and scientometric indicators in China.”
In Handbook of quantitative science and technology research,
pp. 497-514. Springer Netherlands, 2004.
*
“The research assessment exercise and medical research.”
British Medical Journal 320, no. 7235 (2000): 636.
*
“From text to codings: intercoder reliability assessment in qualitative content analysis.”
Nursing research 57, no. 2 (2008): 113-117.
*
“The use of research evidence in public health decision making processes: systematic review.”
PloS one 6, no. 7 (2011): e21704.
*
Martin Shipley, Keith R. Abrams et al.
“Evaluating the quality of research into a single prognostic biomarker:
a systematic review and meta-analysis of 83 studies of C-reactive protein
in stable coronary artery disease.”
PLoS Med 7, no. 6 (2010): e1000286.
*
“Evaluation of societal quality of public sector research in the Netherlands.”
Research Evaluation 9, no. 1 (2000): 11-25.
*
“Quality of standardised patient research reports in the medical education literature:
review and recommendations.”
Medical education 42, no. 4 (2008): 350-358.
*
“The correlation between citation counts and the 1992 research assessment exercise ratings
for British research in genetics, anatomy and archaeology.”
Journal of documentation 53, no. 5 (1997): 477-487.
*
“An evaluation tool to assess the quality of qualitative research studies.”
International Journal of Social Research Methodology 7, no. 2 (2004): 181-196.
*
“Some misuses of journal impact factor in research evaluation.”
Cortex 37, no. 4 (2001): 595-597.
*
Falchikov, Nancy, and David Boud.
“Student self-assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis.”
Review of Educational Research 59, no. 4 (1989): 395-430.
“Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies.”
BMC medical research methodology 8, no. 1 (2008): 22.
*
“Checklist for the evaluation of research articles.”
Journal of adolescent health 15, no. 1 (1994): 4-8.
*
“Assessment of the scientific basis of interdisciplinary, applied research:
application of bibliometric methods in nutrition and food research.”
Research Policy 31, no. 4 (2002): 611-632.
*
The unequal burden of cancer: an assessment of NIH research and programs
for ethnic minorities and the medically underserved.
National Academies Press, 1999.
*
Derek J. Smolenski, Jennifer D. June, Melinda Metzger-Abamukong, and Greg M. Reger.
“Virtual reality exposure therapy for the treatment of anxiety disorders:
an evaluation of research quality.”
Journal of anxiety disorders 28, no. 6 (2014): 625-631.
*
“Benchmarking international scientific excellence:
Are highly cited research papers an appropriate frame of reference?.”
Scientometrics 54, no. 3 (2002): 381-397.
*
“Some bibliometric correlates of quality in scientific research.”
Scientometrics 9, no. 1-2 (1986): 13-25.
*
“Teaching and research quality indicators and the shaping of higher education.”
Research in Higher Education 39, no. 1 (1998): 19-41.
*
“Quality of research design moderates effects of grade retention on achievement:
A meta-analytic, multilevel analysis.”
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 31, no. 4 (2009): 480-499.
*
“Quantitative Research Measurement in Public Administration An Assessment of Journal Publications.”
Administration & Society 35, no. 6 (2004): 747-764.
*
“An evaluation of research performance for different subject categories using Impact Factor Point Average (IFPA) index:
Thailand case study.”
Scientometrics 65, no. 3 (2005): 293-305.
*
“Instruments for assessing the quality of drug studies published in the medical literature.”
JAMA 272, no. 2 (1994): 101-104.
*
“Peer review, the research assessment exercise and the demise of non-mainstream economics.”
Capital and Class 22, no. 3 (1998): 23-51.
*
“Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies.”
The Cochrane Library (2006).
*
Kajermo, Kerstin Nilsson, Gun Nordström, Åsa Krusebrant, and Hjördis Björvell.
“Barriers to and facilitators of research utilization, as perceived
by a group of registered nurses in Sweden.”
Journal of advanced nursing 27, no. 4 (1998): 798-807.
*
“Research quality and efficiency: An analysis of assessments and management issues
in Dutch economics and business research programs.”
Research Policy 35, no. 9 (2006): 1362-1376.
*
Fit for purpose?: assessing research quality for evidence based policy and practice.
London: ESRC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice, 2003.
*
Ruth A. Milner, and David L. Streiner.
“Agreement among reviewers of review articles.”
Journal of clinical epidemiology 44, no. 1 (1991): 91-98.
*
Citation analysis in research evaluation.
Vol. 9. Springer Science & Business Media, 2006.
*
“Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences?.”
Scientometrics 62, no. 1 (2005): 117-131.
*
Bridget Young, Sheila Bonas, Andrew Booth, and David Jones.
“Appraising qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews:
a quantitative and qualitative comparison of three methods.”
Journal of health services research & policy 12, no. 1 (2007): 42-47.
*
Stephanie Chang, Paola Muti, Roman Jaeschke, and Gordon H. Guyatt.
Evidence Based Medicine 13, no. 6 (2008): 162-163.
“The familiarity with and perceived quality of accounting journals:
views of senior accounting faculty in leading US MBA programs.”
Contemporary Accounting Research 11, no. 1 (1994): 223-250.
*
“Validity, reliability and the quality of research.”
Researching society and culture (2004): 71-83.
*
Barend Van Der Meulen, and Peter Van Den Besselaar.
“Evaluation of research in context: an approach and two cases.”
Research Evaluation 20, no. 1 (2011): 61-72.
*
“Scoreboards of research excellence.”
Research Evaluation 12, no. 2 (2003): 91-103.http://tinyurl.com/mja2rno
*
“Clinical trials comparing acupuncture with biomedical standard care:
A criteria-based evaluation of research design and reporting.”
Complementary Therapies in Medicine 5, no. 3 (1997): 133-140.
*
“Scientific research evaluation: a review of methods and various contexts of their application.”
R&D Management 17, no. 3 (1987): 207-221.
*
“Measuring research quality: the United Kingdom government’s research assessment exercise.”
European Journal of Information Systems 17, no. 4 (2008): 324-329.
*
“Research actors and the state: research evaluation
and evaluation of science and technology policies in Spain.”
Research Evaluation 5, no. 1 (1995): 79-88.
*
“A systematic survey of the quality of research reporting in general orthopaedic journals.”
J Bone Joint Surg Br 93, no. 9 (2011): 1154-1159.
*
Evaluation of Research. A Selection of Current Practices.
OECD Publications Service, Sales and Distribution Division,
2, rue Andre-Pascal, 75775 Paris, France., 1987.
*
“The San Francisco declaration on research assessment.”
(2013): 869-870.
*
“The issue of quality in qualitative research.”
International Journal of Research & Method in Education 30, no. 3 (2007): 287-305.
*
“Quality and the research assessment exercise: just one aspect of performance?.”
Quality Assurance in Education 9, no. 1 (2001): 5-13.
*
“What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? A literature survey.”
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64, no. 2 (2013): 217-233.
*
“Influences on the quality of published drug studies.”
International journal of technology assessment in health care
12, no. 02 (1996): 209-237.
*
Quality assurance in higher education: Trends in regulation, translation and transformation.
Vol. 20. Springer Science & Business Media, 2007.
*
“An empirical assessment of influences on POM research.”
Omega 24, no. 3 (1996): 337-345.
*
“Expert panels evaluating research: decision-making and sources of bias.”
Research Evaluation 13, no. 1 (2004).
*
“Clinical research in family medicine: quantity and quality of published articles.”
FAMILY MEDICINE-KANSAS CITY- 35, no. 4 (2003): 284-288.
“The state of the field in UK management research: reflections of the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) Panel.”
British Journal of Management 14, no. 1 (2003): 51-68.
*
“The effect of scholar collaboration on impact and quality of academic papers.”
Journal of informetrics 4, no. 4 (2010): 540-553.
*
“Cumulating the intellectual gold of case study research.”
Public Administration Review 61, no. 2 (2001): 235-246.
*
“Testing novel quantitative indicators of research’quality’, esteem and’user engagement’:
an economics pilot study.”
Research Evaluation 16, no. 4 (2007).
*
“An assessment of the methodological quality of research published in The American Journal of Sports Medicine.”
The American journal of sports medicine 33, no. 12 (2005): 1812-1815.
*
“The evolution of the UK’s Research Assessment Exercise: publications, performance and perceptions.”
Journal of Educational Administration and History 37, no. 2 (2005): 137-155.
*
“The influence of peer review on the research assessment exercise.”
Journal of Information Science 30, no. 4 (2004): 347-368.
*
“The role of academic journal publications in the UK Research Assessment Exercise.”
Learned Publishing 17, no. 1 (2004): 53-68.
*
“The journal impact factor: too much of an impact?.”
Annals-Academy Of Medicine Singapore 35, no. 12 (2006): 911.
*
Shaw, Ian, and Matthew Norton.
“Kinds and quality of social work research.”
British Journal of Social Work 38, no. 5 (2008): 953-970.
*
“Publication ethics and the research assessment exercise:
reflections on the troubled question of authorship.”
Journal of Medical Ethics 26, no. 6 (2000): 422-426.
*
“Informing client-centred practice through qualitative inquiry:
Evaluating the quality of qualitative research.”
The British Journal of Occupational Therapy 65, no. 4 (2002): 175-184.
*
“Judging the quality of qualitative inquiry: Criteriology and relativism in action.”
Psychology of sport and exercise 10, no. 5 (2009): 491-497.
*
“Evaluating research: from informed peer review to bibliometrics.”
Scientometrics 87, no. 3 (2011): 499-514.
*
“Assessment of research quality.”
Research in Higher Education 37, no. 1 (1996): 23-42.
*
“The philosophy and practice of interpretivist research in entrepreneurship:
Quality, validation, and trust.”
Organizational Research Methods 13, no. 1 (2010): 67-84.
*
“Research quality assessment in education: impossible science, possible art?.”
British Educational Research Journal 35, no. 4 (2009): 497-517.
*
“The quality of research in sports journals.”
British journal of sports medicine 36, no. 2 (2002): 124-125.
*
“How to improve research quality? Examining the impacts of collaboration intensity
and member diversity in collaboration networks.”
Scientometrics 86, no. 3 (2011): 747-761.
*
“Comparison of peer and citation assessment of the influence of scientific journals.”
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 31, no. 3 (1980): 147-152.
*
“Considering quality in qualitative interviewing.”
Qualitative Research 10, no. 2 (2010): 199-228.
*
“Quality assurance of qualitative research: a review of the discourse.”
Health Research Policy and Systems 9, no. 1 (2011): 43.
*
“The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews:
an independent appraisal.”
Critical care medicine 35, no. 2 (2007): 589-594.
*
“The relationship between quality in research and quality in teaching.”
Quality in Higher Education 1, no. 2 (1995): 147-157.
*
“Measuring research quality using the journal impact factor, citations and ‘Ranked Journals’:
blunt instruments or inspired metrics?.”
Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 31, no. 4 (2009): 289-300.
*
“The use of performance indicators in higher education: The challenge of the quality movement.”
Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 1997.
*
“Highly cited leaders and the performance of research universities.”
Research Policy 38, no. 7 (2009): 1079-1092.
*
“Academic research and teaching quality: the views of undergraduate and postgraduate students.”
Studies in Higher Education 27, no. 3 (2002): 309-327.
*
“Performance evaluation of research universities in Mainland China, Hong Kong and Taiwan:
based on a two-dimensional approach.”
Scientometrics 90, no. 2 (2012): 531-542.
*
“Fair assessment of the merits of psychiatric research.”
The British Journal of Psychiatry 190, no. 4 (2007): 314-318.
*
“The mires of research evaluation.”
The Scientist 15, no. 10 (2001): 35-35.
*
“Systematic assessment of the quality of research studies of conventional and alternative treatment (s)
of primary headache.”
Pain Physician 12, no. 2 (2009): 461-70.
*
“Science for the post-normal age.”
Futures 25, no. 7 (1993): 739-755.
*
*
DATABASE SEARCH RESULTS
*
*
(“RESEARCH REPORTS” OR “JOURNAL ARTICLES” OR “RESEARCH STUDIES”) AND
(“evaluating sources” OR “source evaluation” OR “critical assessment”) AND
(“PEER REVIEWED” OR “EVIDENCE BASED” OR QUALITY OR QUANTITATIVE OR
QUALITATIVE OR ACCURACY OR VALIDITY)
*
*
Google Books
*
Google Scholar
*
Google Images
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (IMAGES)
*
Google News
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (NEWS)
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (BLOGS)
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (VIDEOS)
*
YouTube
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (PUBMED)
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (SCIENCEDIRECT)
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (JSTOR)
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (NCJRS)
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (GOV)
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (ORG)
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (ERIC/EDU)
*
Penn State Summon Search
- Archival Material (2) Include Exclude
- Book / eBook (31,683) Include Exclude
- Book Chapter (1,097) Include Exclude
- Book Review (706) Include Exclude
- Conference Proceeding (99) Include Exclude
- Data Set (1) Include Exclude
- Dissertation/Thesis (1,399) Include Exclude
- Electronic Resource (3) Include Exclude
- Government Document (32) Include Exclude
- Journal / eJournal (1) Include Exclude
- Journal Article (12,495) Include Exclude
- Magazine Article (62) Include Exclude
- Market Research (2) Include Exclude
- Newsletter (12) Include Exclude
- Newspaper Article (148) Include Exclude
- Paper (8) Include Exclude
- Publication (3) Include Exclude
- Reference (125) Include Exclude
- Report (7) Include Exclude
- Research Guide (681) Include Exclude
- Trade Publication Article (30) Include Exclude
- Transcript (3) Include Exclude
- Web Resource (6) Include Exclude
*
Purdue Primo Search FROM Ex Libris/Alma
8,501 for Everything
*
.
.
How to Write a Research Paper
http://guides.temple.edu/research-papers
.
How to Write an Annotated Bibliography
http://guides.temple.edu/annotated-bibliographies
.
How to Find and Write Book Reviews:
Databases and Search Engine Searches for Finding Book Reviews
http://guides.temple.edu/bkrev
.
Digital Humanities and Digital Initiatives Sources
http://guides.temple.edu/digital-humanities
.
DISSERTATIONS: Finding and Writing Dissertations and Theses
http://guides.temple.edu/dissertations
.
Faculty Credentialing
http://guides.temple.edu/FacultyCredentialing
.
GOVERNMENT PUBLICATION MANUALS :
Government Writing Manuals Guides and Handbooks
http://guides.temple.edu/GovWritingManuals
.
Grey Literature Sources and Tools
http://guides.temple.edu/grey-literature
.
INFORMATION LITERACY AND FRIENDS
.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT GUIDE SERIES:
COPYRIGHT, Intellectual Property and Plagiarism Sources
http://guides.temple.edu/copyright-plagiarism
.
Fair Use Under Copyright Law:
Fair Use Books, Websites and Database Search Results
http://guides.temple.edu/fair-use
.
JOURNAL CITATION RANKING SUBJECT LISTS FEATURING SCIMAGO:
Citation Analysis, Journal Rankings and Rankings Within Disciplines
and Faculty Assessment and Credentialing
http://guides.temple.edu/journal-citation-ranking
.
How to Create a Literature Review
http://guides.temple.edu/literature-review
.
Media Literacy and News Literacy
http://guides.temple.edu/medialit
.
How to Create a Meta-Analysis and a Systematic Review
http://guides.temple.edu/Meta-Analysis
.
NEWS: Newspapers News and News Archive Resources
.
Plain English Writing Books and Database Search Results
http://guides.temple.edu/plain-english
.
REFWORKS
http://guides.temple.edu/ref-works
STATISTICS:
Databases, Sources and Database Search Results
for Statisitical Data Compilations and Publications
Including an Extensive Section of United States
Government Agencies with Database Search Results
from Nineteen Database Search Links for Each Agency
http://guides.temple.edu/statistics-sources
.
Research Guide Directory : Discussion Group Directory
https://sites.google.com/site/researchguidesonsites/
.
.
[PDF] Evaluating Sources of Information
PK Hurley – Online Text and Course Materials – Citeseer
.
Articles
Writing Centers and Libraries: One-Stop Shopping for Better Term Papers
DOI:10.1080/02763870802101310
Rachel Cookea* & Carol Bledsoeb
pages 119-127
Published online: 12 Dec 2008
The Reference Librarian
Volume 49, Issue 2, 2008
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02763870802101310
.
MacDonald, A. B.
(2010).
Multiple Visions of the Research Paper:
How Compositionists and Librarians Understand, Represent, and Teach
the Research Process
(Doctoral dissertation, Auburn University).
https://etd.auburn.edu/handle/10415/2072
.
Donahue, A. E., and Gamtso, C.
(2010).
Term papers, Google, and library anxiety:
how can information literacy improve students’ research skills?.
.
DATABASE SEARCH RESULTS: Penn State Summon Search
(“term paper” OR “term papers” OR “research paper” OR “research papers”)
AND (“source evaluation” OR “evaluating sources”)
2,774 results
Source Types
- Book / eBook (1,960) Include Exclude
- Book Chapter (32) Include Exclude
- Book Review (21) Include Exclude
- Conference Proceeding (5) Include Exclude
- Dissertation/Thesis (52) Include Exclude
- Government Document (3) Include Exclude
- Journal Article (335) Include Exclude
- Magazine Article (7) Include Exclude
- Newsletter (2) Include Exclude
- Newspaper Article (15) Include Exclude
- Poster (1) Include Exclude
- Reference (23) Include Exclude
- Report (1) Include Exclude
- Research Guide (347) Include Exclude
- Trade Publication Article (2) Include Exclude
- Web Resource (3) Include Exclude
Content Sample
MLA handbook for writers of research papers
Book: Stacks – General Collection, LB2369.M165 1999, Penn State Beaver (+8 More)
MLA handbook for writers of research papers
on MLA documentation style. Widely adopted in high schools, colleges, and…
The elements of library research: what every student needs to know
This short, practical book introduces students to the important…
10 steps in writing the research paper
The Little, Brown guide to writing research papers
Writing Centers and Libraries: One-Stop Shopping for Better Term Papers
Beyond Consultation: A New Model for Librarian’s Office Hours
Writing a research paper: students explain their process
Writing research papers: a complete guide
.
.
.
The Critical Assessment of Research:
Traditional and New Methods of Evaluation
Chandos information professional series
Authors Alan Bailin, Ann Grafstein
Publisher Chandos, 2010
Original from University of Chicago
Digitized Apr 18, 2011
ISBN 1843345439, 9781843345435
Length 121 pages
*
Educational Research:
Why ‘What Works’ Doesn’t Work
Volume 1 of Educational Research
Editors Paul Smeyers, Marc Depaepe
Edition illustrated, reprint
Publisher
Springer Science & Business Media, 2007
ISBN 1402053088, 9781402053085
Length 196 pages
*
Managing Quality in Qualitative Research
Qualitative Research Kit
Author Uwe Flick
Edition reprint
Publisher SAGE, 2008
ISBN 144620524X, 9781446205242
Length 160 pages
*
A Bird’s-Eye View of Assessment:
Selections from Editor’s Notes
Volume 10 of Assessment Update Special Collections
Editor Trudy W. Banta
Publisher John Wiley & Sons, 2011
ISBN 1118109155, 9781118109151
Length 96 pages
*
“evaluation of research” OR “evaluating research” OR “research evaluation” OR (assessment AND “quality of research”)
*
Handbook of Family Literacy
Editor Barbara Hanna Wasik
Edition illustrated, reprint
Publisher Routledge, 2012
ISBN 0415884578, 9780415884570
Length 479 pages
*
Organizations and Strategies in Astronomy, Volume 3
Volume 256; Volume 266; Volume 280; Volume 296;
Volume 310 of Astrophysics and Space Science Library :
a series of books on the recent developments of space
science and of general geophysics and astrophysics
Astrophysics and Space Science Library, ISSN 0067-0057
Organizations and Strategies in Astronomy, André Heck
Editor Andre Heck
Edition illustrated
Publisher Springer Science & Business Media, 2002
ISBN 1402008120, 9781402008122
Length 238 pages
*
Library Assessment in Higher Education
Author Joseph R. Matthews
Publisher Greenwood Publishing Group, 2007
ISBN 031309487X, 9780313094873
Length 146 pages
*
Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research:
The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems
Editors Henk F. Moed, Wolfgang Glänzel, Ulrich Schmoch
Edition illustrated
Publisher Springer Science & Business Media, 2004
ISBN 1402027028, 9781402027024
Length 800 pages
*
Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation
Volume 9 of Information Science and Knowledge Management
Author Henk F. Moed
Edition illustrated
Publisher Springer Science & Business Media, 2006
ISBN 1402037147, 9781402037146
Length 348 pages
*
Evidence-Based Prevention
Prevention Practice Kit
Editors Katherine Raczynski,
Michael Waldo, Jonathan P. Schwartz,
Arthur M. Horne
Publisher SAGE Publications, 2012
ISBN 1483307654, 9781483307657
Length 96 pages
*
The SAGE Handbook of Social Work Research
Sage Handbooks
Author Ian Shaw
Edition illustrated
Publisher SAGE Publications, 2009
ISBN 1412934982, 9781412934985
Length 572 pages
An Introduction to Qualitative Research
Author Uwe Flick
Publisher SAGE, 2009
ISBN 1446241319, 9781446241318
Length 528 pages
*
Issues in Discovery, Experimental,
and Laboratory Medicine:
2011 Edition
Contributor Q. Ashton Acton, PhD
Publisher ScholarlyEditions, 2012
ISBN 1464963509, 9781464963506
Length 3453 pages
*
The Quality of Qualitative Research
Introducing Qualitative Methods series
Author Clive Seale
Publisher SAGE, 1999
ISBN 144627621X, 9781446276211
Length 224 pages
*
How to Do Research: A Psychologist’s Guide
Author Jonathan St. B. T. Evans
Edition illustrated
Publisher Taylor & Francis, 2005
ISBN 1841695424, 9781841695426
Length 126 pages
*
Assessing Faculty Work: Enhancing Individual and Institutional Performance.
Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. Jossey-Bass Inc.,
350 Sansome Street, San Francisco, CA 94104, 1994.
*
“Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews:
a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool
and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research.”
Journal of evaluation in clinical practice 18, no. 1 (2012): 12-18.
*
“Publish and perish?
Bibliometric analysis, journal ranking and the assessment of research quality in tourism.”
Tourism Management 32, no. 1 (2011): 16-27.
*
“What are quality of life measurements measuring?.”
BMJ: British Medical Journal 316, no. 7130 (1998): 542.
*
Assessing the quality of research.”
BMJ: British Medical Journal 328, no. 7430 (2004): 39.
*
“Association of journal quality indicators with methodological quality of clinical research articles.”
JAMA 287, no. 21 (2002): 2805-2808.
*
“Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment:
enabling reuse for clinical research.”
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 20, no. 1 (2013): 144-151.
Jeremy Grimshaw, David A. Henry, and Maarten Boers.
“AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool
to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews.”
Journal of clinical epidemiology 62, no. 10 (2009): 1013-1020.
*
“Auditing quality of research in social sciences.”
Quality & Quantity 42, no. 2 (2008): 257-274.
*
“What’s in a number? Issues in providing evidence of impact and quality of research (ers).”
Qualitative Health Research 16, no. 3 (2006): 423-435.
*
Oxman, Andrew D., and Gordon H. Guyatt.
“Validation of an index of the quality of review articles.”
Journal of clinical epidemiology 44, no. 11 (1991): 1271-1278.
*
Quality of life research: A critical introduction.
Sage, 2003.
*
“The effects of medical school curricula, faculty role models, and biomedical research support
on choice of generalist physician careers: a review and quality assessment of the literature.”
Academic Medicine 70, no. 7 (1995): 611-9.
*
“The assessment of quality in higher education: A critical review of the literature and research.”
Research in higher education 24, no. 3 (1986): 223-265.
*
“The assessment of research quality in UK universities: Peer review or metrics?.”
British Journal of Management 22, no. 2 (2011): 202-217.
*
Review of research assessment.
London: RA Review, 2003.
*
“A classification and evaluation of research in operations management.”
Journal of Operations Management 1, no. 1 (1980): 9-14.
*
“Quality in qualitative research.”
Qualitative inquiry 5, no. 4 (1999): 465-478.
*
BMJ: British Medical Journal 323, no. 7312 (2001): 528.
*
“Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability.”
Human communication research 28, no. 4 (2002): 587-604.
*
“A systematic and transparent approach for assessing
the methodological quality of intervention effectiveness research:
the Study Design and Implementation Assessment Device (Study DIAD).”
Psychological methods 13, no. 2 (2008): 130.
*
“Assessing quality in applied and practice-based educational research: A framework for discussion.”
Review of Australian research in education: counterpoints on the quality and impact of educational research––
a special issue of the Australian Educational Researcher 6 (2005): 89-104.
*
“Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review.”
Bmj 326, no. 7400 (2003): 1167-1170.
*
“A review of research on fidelity of implementation:
implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings.”
Health education research 18, no. 2 (2003): 237-256.
*
“Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence.”
Obstetrics & Gynecology 114, no. 6 (2009): 1341-1345.
*
“University research evaluation and funding: An international comparison.”
Minerva 41, no. 4 (2003): 277-304.
*
Tasha Stanton, and David J. Magee.
“Scales to assess the quality of randomized controlled trials: a systematic review.”
Physical therapy 88, no. 2 (2008): 156.
*
“Are international co-publications an indicator for quality of scientific research?.”
Scientometrics 74, no. 3 (2007): 361-377.
*
“Quality of reporting of observational longitudinal research.”
American Journal of Epidemiology 161, no. 3 (2005): 280-288.
*
“Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology:
a systematic review and annotated bibliography.”
International journal of epidemiology 36, no. 3 (2007): 666-676.
*
“The UK Research Assessment Exercise:
the evolution of a national research evaluation system.”
Research Evaluation 16, no. 1 (2007): 3-12.
*
“The UK research assessment exercise: unintended consequences.”
Higher Education Quarterly 54, no. 3 (2000): 274-283.
*
“The future of research evaluation
rests with an intelligent combination of advanced metrics and transparent peer review.”
Science and Public Policy (SPP) 34, no. 8 (2007).
*
“The GRIPP checklist: strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research.”
International journal of technology assessment in health care 27, no. 04 (2011): 391-399.
*
“Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research.”
Qualitative health research 8, no. 3 (1998): 341-351.
“Health information literacy and competencies of information age students:
results from the interactive online Research Readiness Self-Assessment (RRSA).”
Journal of Medical Internet Research 8, no. 2 (2006): e6.
*
“The utilisation of health research in policy-making:
concepts, examples and methods of assessment.”
Health research policy and systems 1, no. 1 (2003): 2.
*
“Producing spaces for academic discourse:
The impact of research assessment exercises and journal quality rankings.”
Australian Accounting Review 20, no. 1 (2010): 38-54.
*
“Weight of evidence: a framework for the appraisal of the quality and relevance of evidence.”
Research papers in education 22, no. 2 (2007): 213-228.
*
“The Research Assessment Exercise,
the state and the dominance of mainstream economics in British universities.”
Cambridge Journal of Economics 31, no. 2 (2007): 309-325.
*
Assessing the quality of educational research in higher education: International perspectives.
Sense Publishers, 2009.
*
“Judging research quality.”
The handbook of research synthesis (1994): 97-109.
*
“‘Never mind the quality, feel the impact’: a methodological assessment of teacher research
sponsored by the Teacher Training Agency.”
British Journal of Educational Studies 47, no. 4 (1999): 380-398.
*
“Judging the quality of research in business schools: The UK as a case study.”
Omega 23, no. 3 (1995): 257-270.
*
“Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review.”
BMC medical research methodology 9, no. 1 (2009): 59.
*
“Accreditation, commercial rankings, and new approaches
to assessing the quality of university research and education programmes in the United States.”
Higher Education in Europe 27, no. 4 (2002): 433-441.
*
“Dissertation research in public administration and cognate fields:
An assessment of methods and quality.”
Public Administration Review (1994): 565-576.
*
“An empirical study of the possible relation of treatment differences to quality scores
in controlled randomized clinical trials.”
Controlled clinical trials 11, no. 5 (1990): 339-352.
*
“Value efficiency analysis of academic research.”
European Journal of Operational Research 130, no. 1 (2001): 121-132.
*
“Evidence-based burn care—an assessment of the methodological quality of research published
in burn care journals from 1982 to 2008.”
Burns 36, no. 8 (2010): 1190-1195.
*
“Quality of inferences in mixed methods research: Calling for an integrative framework.”
Advances in mixed methods research (2008): 101-119.
*
“Evolving regimes of multi-university research evaluation.”
Higher Education 57, no. 4 (2009): 393-404.
*
Jin, Bihui, and Ronald Rousseau.
“Evaluation of research performance and scientometric indicators in China.”
In Handbook of quantitative science and technology research,
pp. 497-514. Springer Netherlands, 2004.
*
“The research assessment exercise and medical research.”
British Medical Journal 320, no. 7235 (2000): 636.
*
“From text to codings: intercoder reliability assessment in qualitative content analysis.”
Nursing research 57, no. 2 (2008): 113-117.
*
“The use of research evidence in public health decision making processes: systematic review.”
PloS one 6, no. 7 (2011): e21704.
*
Martin Shipley, Keith R. Abrams et al.
“Evaluating the quality of research into a single prognostic biomarker:
a systematic review and meta-analysis of 83 studies of C-reactive protein
in stable coronary artery disease.”
PLoS Med 7, no. 6 (2010): e1000286.
*
“Evaluation of societal quality of public sector research in the Netherlands.”
Research Evaluation 9, no. 1 (2000): 11-25.
*
“Quality of standardised patient research reports in the medical education literature:
review and recommendations.”
Medical education 42, no. 4 (2008): 350-358.
*
“The correlation between citation counts and the 1992 research assessment exercise ratings
for British research in genetics, anatomy and archaeology.”
Journal of documentation 53, no. 5 (1997): 477-487.
*
“An evaluation tool to assess the quality of qualitative research studies.”
International Journal of Social Research Methodology 7, no. 2 (2004): 181-196.
*
“Some misuses of journal impact factor in research evaluation.”
Cortex 37, no. 4 (2001): 595-597.
*
Falchikov, Nancy, and David Boud.
“Student self-assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis.”
Review of Educational Research 59, no. 4 (1989): 395-430.
“Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies.”
BMC medical research methodology 8, no. 1 (2008): 22.
*
“Checklist for the evaluation of research articles.”
Journal of adolescent health 15, no. 1 (1994): 4-8.
*
“Assessment of the scientific basis of interdisciplinary, applied research:
application of bibliometric methods in nutrition and food research.”
Research Policy 31, no. 4 (2002): 611-632.
*
The unequal burden of cancer: an assessment of NIH research and programs
for ethnic minorities and the medically underserved.
National Academies Press, 1999.
*
Derek J. Smolenski, Jennifer D. June, Melinda Metzger-Abamukong, and Greg M. Reger.
“Virtual reality exposure therapy for the treatment of anxiety disorders:
an evaluation of research quality.”
Journal of anxiety disorders 28, no. 6 (2014): 625-631.
*
“Benchmarking international scientific excellence:
Are highly cited research papers an appropriate frame of reference?.”
Scientometrics 54, no. 3 (2002): 381-397.
*
“Some bibliometric correlates of quality in scientific research.”
Scientometrics 9, no. 1-2 (1986): 13-25.
*
“Teaching and research quality indicators and the shaping of higher education.”
Research in Higher Education 39, no. 1 (1998): 19-41.
*
“Quality of research design moderates effects of grade retention on achievement:
A meta-analytic, multilevel analysis.”
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 31, no. 4 (2009): 480-499.
*
“Quantitative Research Measurement in Public Administration An Assessment of Journal Publications.”
Administration & Society 35, no. 6 (2004): 747-764.
*
“An evaluation of research performance for different subject categories using Impact Factor Point Average (IFPA) index:
Thailand case study.”
Scientometrics 65, no. 3 (2005): 293-305.
*
“Instruments for assessing the quality of drug studies published in the medical literature.”
JAMA 272, no. 2 (1994): 101-104.
*
“Peer review, the research assessment exercise and the demise of non-mainstream economics.”
Capital and Class 22, no. 3 (1998): 23-51.
*
“Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies.”
The Cochrane Library (2006).
*
Kajermo, Kerstin Nilsson, Gun Nordström, Åsa Krusebrant, and Hjördis Björvell.
“Barriers to and facilitators of research utilization, as perceived
by a group of registered nurses in Sweden.”
Journal of advanced nursing 27, no. 4 (1998): 798-807.
*
“Research quality and efficiency: An analysis of assessments and management issues
in Dutch economics and business research programs.”
Research Policy 35, no. 9 (2006): 1362-1376.
*
Fit for purpose?: assessing research quality for evidence based policy and practice.
London: ESRC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice, 2003.
*
Ruth A. Milner, and David L. Streiner.
“Agreement among reviewers of review articles.”
Journal of clinical epidemiology 44, no. 1 (1991): 91-98.
*
Citation analysis in research evaluation.
Vol. 9. Springer Science & Business Media, 2006.
*
“Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences?.”
Scientometrics 62, no. 1 (2005): 117-131.
*
Bridget Young, Sheila Bonas, Andrew Booth, and David Jones.
“Appraising qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews:
a quantitative and qualitative comparison of three methods.”
Journal of health services research & policy 12, no. 1 (2007): 42-47.
*
Stephanie Chang, Paola Muti, Roman Jaeschke, and Gordon H. Guyatt.
Evidence Based Medicine 13, no. 6 (2008): 162-163.
*
“The familiarity with and perceived quality of accounting journals:
views of senior accounting faculty in leading US MBA programs.”
Contemporary Accounting Research 11, no. 1 (1994): 223-250.
*
“Validity, reliability and the quality of research.”
Researching society and culture (2004): 71-83.
*
Barend Van Der Meulen, and Peter Van Den Besselaar.
“Evaluation of research in context: an approach and two cases.”
Research Evaluation 20, no. 1 (2011): 61-72.
*
“Scoreboards of research excellence.”
Research Evaluation 12, no. 2 (2003): 91-103.http://tinyurl.com/mja2rno
*
“Clinical trials comparing acupuncture with biomedical standard care:
A criteria-based evaluation of research design and reporting.”
Complementary Therapies in Medicine 5, no. 3 (1997): 133-140.
*
“Scientific research evaluation: a review of methods and various contexts of their application.”
R&D Management 17, no. 3 (1987): 207-221.
*
“Measuring research quality: the United Kingdom government’s research assessment exercise.”
European Journal of Information Systems 17, no. 4 (2008): 324-329.
*
“Research actors and the state: research evaluation
and evaluation of science and technology policies in Spain.”
Research Evaluation 5, no. 1 (1995): 79-88.
*
“A systematic survey of the quality of research reporting in general orthopaedic journals.”
J Bone Joint Surg Br 93, no. 9 (2011): 1154-1159.
*
Evaluation of Research. A Selection of Current Practices.
OECD Publications Service, Sales and Distribution Division,
2, rue Andre-Pascal, 75775 Paris, France., 1987.
*
“The San Francisco declaration on research assessment.”
(2013): 869-870.
*
“The issue of quality in qualitative research.”
International Journal of Research & Method in Education 30, no. 3 (2007): 287-305.
*
“Quality and the research assessment exercise: just one aspect of performance?.”
Quality Assurance in Education 9, no. 1 (2001): 5-13.
*
“What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? A literature survey.”
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64, no. 2 (2013): 217-233.
*
“Influences on the quality of published drug studies.”
International journal of technology assessment in health care
12, no. 02 (1996): 209-237.
*
Quality assurance in higher education: Trends in regulation, translation and transformation.
Vol. 20. Springer Science & Business Media, 2007.
*
“An empirical assessment of influences on POM research.”
Omega 24, no. 3 (1996): 337-345.
*
“Expert panels evaluating research: decision-making and sources of bias.”
Research Evaluation 13, no. 1 (2004).
*
“Clinical research in family medicine: quantity and quality of published articles.”
FAMILY MEDICINE-KANSAS CITY- 35, no. 4 (2003): 284-288.
“The state of the field in UK management research: reflections of the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) Panel.”
British Journal of Management 14, no. 1 (2003): 51-68.
*
“The effect of scholar collaboration on impact and quality of academic papers.”
Journal of informetrics 4, no. 4 (2010): 540-553.
*
“Cumulating the intellectual gold of case study research.”
Public Administration Review 61, no. 2 (2001): 235-246.
*
“Testing novel quantitative indicators of research’quality’, esteem and’user engagement’:
an economics pilot study.”
Research Evaluation 16, no. 4 (2007).
*
“An assessment of the methodological quality of research published in The American Journal of Sports Medicine.”
The American journal of sports medicine 33, no. 12 (2005): 1812-1815.
*
“The evolution of the UK’s Research Assessment Exercise: publications, performance and perceptions.”
Journal of Educational Administration and History 37, no. 2 (2005): 137-155.
*
“The influence of peer review on the research assessment exercise.”
Journal of Information Science 30, no. 4 (2004): 347-368.
*
“The role of academic journal publications in the UK Research Assessment Exercise.”
Learned Publishing 17, no. 1 (2004): 53-68.
*
“The journal impact factor: too much of an impact?.”
Annals-Academy Of Medicine Singapore 35, no. 12 (2006): 911.
*
Shaw, Ian, and Matthew Norton.
“Kinds and quality of social work research.”
British Journal of Social Work 38, no. 5 (2008): 953-970.
*
“Publication ethics and the research assessment exercise:
reflections on the troubled question of authorship.”
Journal of Medical Ethics 26, no. 6 (2000): 422-426.
*
“Informing client-centred practice through qualitative inquiry:
Evaluating the quality of qualitative research.”
The British Journal of Occupational Therapy 65, no. 4 (2002): 175-184.
*
“Judging the quality of qualitative inquiry: Criteriology and relativism in action.”
Psychology of sport and exercise 10, no. 5 (2009): 491-497.
*
“Evaluating research: from informed peer review to bibliometrics.”
Scientometrics 87, no. 3 (2011): 499-514.
*
“Assessment of research quality.”
Research in Higher Education 37, no. 1 (1996): 23-42.
*
“The philosophy and practice of interpretivist research in entrepreneurship:
Quality, validation, and trust.”
Organizational Research Methods 13, no. 1 (2010): 67-84.
*
“Research quality assessment in education: impossible science, possible art?.”
British Educational Research Journal 35, no. 4 (2009): 497-517.
*
“The quality of research in sports journals.”
British journal of sports medicine 36, no. 2 (2002): 124-125.
*
“How to improve research quality? Examining the impacts of collaboration intensity
and member diversity in collaboration networks.”
Scientometrics 86, no. 3 (2011): 747-761.
*
“Comparison of peer and citation assessment of the influence of scientific journals.”
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 31, no. 3 (1980): 147-152.
*
“Considering quality in qualitative interviewing.”
Qualitative Research 10, no. 2 (2010): 199-228.
*
“Quality assurance of qualitative research: a review of the discourse.”
Health Research Policy and Systems 9, no. 1 (2011): 43.
*
“The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews:
an independent appraisal.”
Critical care medicine 35, no. 2 (2007): 589-594.
*
“The relationship between quality in research and quality in teaching.”
Quality in Higher Education 1, no. 2 (1995): 147-157.
*
“Measuring research quality using the journal impact factor, citations and ‘Ranked Journals’:
blunt instruments or inspired metrics?.”
Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 31, no. 4 (2009): 289-300.
*
“The use of performance indicators in higher education: The challenge of the quality movement.”
Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 1997.
*
“Highly cited leaders and the performance of research universities.”
Research Policy 38, no. 7 (2009): 1079-1092.
*
“Academic research and teaching quality: the views of undergraduate and postgraduate students.”
Studies in Higher Education 27, no. 3 (2002): 309-327.
*
“Performance evaluation of research universities in Mainland China, Hong Kong and Taiwan:
based on a two-dimensional approach.”
Scientometrics 90, no. 2 (2012): 531-542.
*
“Fair assessment of the merits of psychiatric research.”
The British Journal of Psychiatry 190, no. 4 (2007): 314-318.
*
“The mires of research evaluation.”
The Scientist 15, no. 10 (2001): 35-35.
*
“Systematic assessment of the quality of research studies of conventional and alternative treatment (s)
of primary headache.”
Pain Physician 12, no. 2 (2009): 461-70.
*
“Science for the post-normal age.”
Futures 25, no. 7 (1993): 739-755.
*
*
DATABASE SEARCH RESULTS
*
*
(“RESEARCH REPORTS” OR “JOURNAL ARTICLES” OR “RESEARCH STUDIES”) AND
(“evaluating sources” OR “source evaluation” OR “critical assessment”) AND
(“PEER REVIEWED” OR “EVIDENCE BASED” OR QUALITY OR QUANTITATIVE OR
QUALITATIVE OR ACCURACY OR VALIDITY)
*
*
Google Books
*
Google Scholar
*
Google Images
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (IMAGES)
*
Google News
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (NEWS)
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (BLOGS)
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (VIDEOS)
*
YouTube
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (PUBMED)
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (SCIENCEDIRECT)
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (JSTOR)
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (NCJRS)
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (GOV)
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (ORG)
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (ERIC/EDU)
*
Penn State Summon Search
- Archival Material (2) Include Exclude
- Book / eBook (31,683) Include Exclude
- Book Chapter (1,097) Include Exclude
- Book Review (706) Include Exclude
- Conference Proceeding (99) Include Exclude
- Data Set (1) Include Exclude
- Dissertation/Thesis (1,399) Include Exclude
- Electronic Resource (3) Include Exclude
- Government Document (32) Include Exclude
- Journal / eJournal (1) Include Exclude
- Journal Article (12,495) Include Exclude
- Magazine Article (62) Include Exclude
- Market Research (2) Include Exclude
- Newsletter (12) Include Exclude
- Newspaper Article (148) Include Exclude
- Paper (8) Include Exclude
- Publication (3) Include Exclude
- Reference (125) Include Exclude
- Report (7) Include Exclude
- Research Guide (681) Include Exclude
- Trade Publication Article (30) Include Exclude
- Transcript (3) Include Exclude
- Web Resource (6) Include Exclude
*
Purdue Primo Search FROM Ex Libris/Alma
8,501 for Everything
Sincerely,
David Dillard
Temple University
http://workface.com/e/daviddillard
NET-GOLD
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/net-gold
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/net-gold.html
https://groups.io/org/groupsio/net-gold/archives
Research Guides
https://sites.google.com/site/researchguidesonsites/
Research Paper Writing
https://sites.google.com/site/howtowriteasuperresearchpaper/
Employment
https://sites.google.com/site/employmentsources/
Internships
https://sites.google.com/site/internshipsarticles/
Blog
https://educatorgold.wordpress.com/
Twitter: davidpdillard
Sport-Med
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/sport-med.html
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/sport-med.html
https://groups.io/g/SportMed/topics
.
.
Please Ignore All Links to JIGLU
in search results for Net-Gold and related lists.
The Net-Gold relationship with JIGLU has
been terminated by JIGLU and these are dead links.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Net-Gold/message/30664
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/healthrecsport/message/145
Temple University Listserv Alert :
Years 2009 and 2010 Eliminated from Archives
https://sites.google.com/site/templeuniversitylistservalert/
.
.
environmentandclimateblog 